2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of state-of-the-art machine and deep learning algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been trained to detect data elements from medical records. One prior study trained a BERT model to automatically detect proximal humeral fractures from radiology reports [6]. In addition, these authors developed different rule-based NLP algorithms and compared them to the BERT.…”
Section: Nlp-based Medical Record Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been trained to detect data elements from medical records. One prior study trained a BERT model to automatically detect proximal humeral fractures from radiology reports [6]. In addition, these authors developed different rule-based NLP algorithms and compared them to the BERT.…”
Section: Nlp-based Medical Record Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall AUC for fracture classification was 0.89, including excellent AUC for diaphyseal humerus fractures (0.97), clavicle fractures (0.96), and good AUC for scapula fractures (0.87), which showed that the proposed model could effectively utilize plain radiographs and classify fractures. Dipnall et al [68] assessed the classification performance of several ML algorithms based on the Neer classification system from six input text datasets, including X-ray and/or CT scan data and patient age and/or sex information. They declared that these ML algorithms achieved satisfactory performance, with one special model exhibiting good accuracy at 61% and an excellent One-versusrest score above 0.8, providing valuable assistance to radiologists and orthopedists by speeding up the classification process.…”
Section: Proximal Humeral Fractures (Phfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall AUC for fracture classification was 0.89, including excellent AUC for diaphyseal humerus fractures (0.97), clavicle fractures (0.96), and good AUC for scapula fractures (0.87), which showed that the proposed model could effectively utilize plain radiographs and classify fractures. Dipnall et al [ 67 ] assessed the classification performance of several ML algorithms based on the Neer classification system from six input text datasets, including X-ray and/or CT scan data and patient age and/or sex information. They declared that these ML algorithms achieved satisfactory performance, with one special model exhibiting good accuracy at 61% and an excellent one-versus-rest score above 0.8, providing valuable assistance to radiologists and orthopedists by speeding up the classification process.…”
Section: Proximal Humeral Fractures (Phfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%