2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7871-2_54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Statistical and Soft Computing Models for Predicting Hardness and Wear Rate of Cu-Ni-Sn Alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the mass loss was obtained. The mass loss was correlated to the wear rate using Equation (3) [5,19,20]. The average friction coefficient was determined using Equation (4) [5,19,20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the mass loss was obtained. The mass loss was correlated to the wear rate using Equation (3) [5,19,20]. The average friction coefficient was determined using Equation (4) [5,19,20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu is the most commonly used material in brake pads because of its good brake performance characteristics and excellent thermal conductivity [11][12][13][14]. Besides, Cu enables a stable friction coefficient and stabilizes smooth sliding [15 -17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gokulchandran et al [13] used Matlab to train a neural network to predict the tool life in which 70 % of the data was used for measurement, 15 % for testing, and remaining for validation purposes. S.Illangovan et al [14] implemented the integration of neural network and fuzzy logic for predicting the hardness and wear rate of specific alloy specimens. Izabela Rojek [15] did a comparative analysis utilizing MLP, RBF, and Kohonen systems for the machine choice, tool choice, and machine parameter choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%