Comparison of stroke ward care versus mobile stroke teams in the Hungarian stroke database project

Abstract

Although previous studies have proved that both stroke wards and mobile stroke teams are considerably better than non-specialized stroke care, an unresolved debate in vascular neurology is whether or not stroke wards provide better outcomes in some specific cases to stroke victims. Our prospective, multicenter, cohort study compared dedicated stroke wards versus specialist stroke team care at general hospital wards in 11 centers nationwide for 8743 consecutive stroke events during 18 months. Twenty-eight-day case-fatality rate was 12.6% at stroke wards versus 15.2% at stroke teams for all patients (P = 0.002), and stroke ward care also predicted better outcome when analyzed with multivariate logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.701; confidence interval: 1.025-2.822). Case-fatality rates were not significantly different in patients with modified Rankin score > or = 2 (case-fatality rate: 17.8% vs. 20.3%; P = 0.163), and over 60 (case-fatality rate: 14.8% vs. 15.9%; P = 0.250), however these patients were more probably at home after 4 weeks when treated at stroke wards (56.1% vs. 50.6%; P = 0.03, and 69.5% vs. 64.5%; P = 0.004). In our study, stroke ward admission provided lower case-fatality rate below 60 and for those independent prior to their strokes, and lower institutionalization over 60 and amongst previously dependent patients, when compared with stroke teams.

New hospital structure in the twenty-first century: the position of level III (tertiary) neurological and stroke care in a changing healthcare system

“…We paid special attention to the position of neurological care within the overall healthcare system and to the separation of stroke and neurological care within neurological care. This latter distinction is justified by the fact that, in Hungary, too, stroke care has been demonstrated to be the most effective when carried out in dedicated stroke units and wards (Óváry et al 2007). …”