2023
DOI: 10.1007/s43188-023-00185-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of structural characteristics and molecular markers of rabbit skin, pig skin, and reconstructed human epidermis for an ex vivo human skin model

Abstract: The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development approved a reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) model for in vitro skin irritation and corrosion tests as an alternative to animal testing for cosmetics, which has been banned in the European Union since 2013. However, RHE models have several limitations, such as high manufacturing costs, a loose skin barrier, and inability to simulate all cellular and non-cellular components of the human epidermis. Therefore, new alternative skin models are needed. Ex … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,34 Porcine skin was chosen as a surrogate for human skin due to its similar histological and physiological markers, thickness, and anatomy. 95,96 The porcine dermal samples were collected posthumously and applied as a membrane between the two chambers of the Franz cell. A known amount of H2S-loaded Mg2(dobdc) was packed into the top donor chamber while HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) was added to the bottom acceptor chamber (SI Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,34 Porcine skin was chosen as a surrogate for human skin due to its similar histological and physiological markers, thickness, and anatomy. 95,96 The porcine dermal samples were collected posthumously and applied as a membrane between the two chambers of the Franz cell. A known amount of H2S-loaded Mg2(dobdc) was packed into the top donor chamber while HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) was added to the bottom acceptor chamber (SI Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, an ex vivo Franz cell model was used (Section S8). , Porcine skin was chosen as a surrogate for human skin due to its similar histological and physiological markers, thickness, and anatomy. , The porcine dermal samples were collected posthumously and applied as a membrane between the two chambers of the Franz cell. A known amount of H 2 S-loaded Mg 2 (dobdc) was packed into the top donor chamber, while HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) was added to the bottom acceptor chamber (Figure S127).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the toxicological tests employed to assess the safety of a substance is acute dermal toxicity, which determines if a substance can cause irreversible damage to the skin and/or systemic toxicity after dermal application [ 17 ]. Commonly, rodents and rabbits are used for dermal toxicity studies; however, the use of minipigs has increased recently owing to similarities with humans in the anatomy and physiology of their skin [ 18 24 ]. Additionally, regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have encouraged the use of minipigs in dermal toxicity studies [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%