Acute burn wounds often require early excision and adequate coverage to prevent further hypothermia, protein and fluid losses, and the risk of infection. Meshed autologous skin grafts are generally regarded as the standard treatment for extensive full-thickness burns. Graft take and rate of wound healing, however, depend on several endogenous factors. This paper describes a standardized reproducible porcine model of burn and skin grafting which can be used to study the effects of topical treatments on graft take and re-epithelialization.Procedures provide a protocol for successful porcine burn wound experiments with special focus on pre-operative care, anesthesia, burn allocation, excision and grafting, postoperative treatment, dressing application, and specimen collection. Selected outcome measurements include percent area of wound closure by planimetry, wound assessment using a clinical assessment scale, and histological scoring.The use of this standardized model provides burn researchers with a valuable tool for the comparison of different topical drug treatments and dressing materials in a setting that closely mimics clinical reality.
KeywordsBurn; Burn excision; Wound healing; Reconstruction; Autograft
BackgroundStandard treatment for severe burns currently includes early excision and adequate coverage to prevent hypothermia, protein and fluid loss, and risk of exogenous infection [1]. Autologous meshed split-thickness skin grafts are generally regarded as the standard treatment for extensive full-thickness burns. Early wound healing with concomitant wound closure is a major factor in patient outcome and infection control.To determine new treatment options which enhance and accelerate wound healing, many investigators rely on animal models to closely observe the healing process. Many animal models have been described in the literature, mostly involving rodents and pigs, with different *Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 409 770 6742; fax: +1409 770 6919. E-mail address: majeschk@utmb.edu (M.G. Jeschke). 1 Authors contributed equally to this manuscript. [2][3][4][5][6]. However, there has been no large animal model described which would encompass a burn excision and autografting, for an extended observation of over 2 weeks, to closely monitor the wound healing progress and its mechanisms. This paper presents a porcine model for the assessment of multiple treatments and quantification of differences in burn wound healing.
Conflict of interest statement
Procedures
Basic and study guidelinesPigs have been used as models for wound healing studies due to their structural and functional resemblance to human skin. The thickness of porcine skin differs greatly depending on the location (pig epidermis: 30-140 μm; Human epidermis: 50-120 μm) [7]. Further, the vascularization of human and porcine skin is similar [8], with both human and pig having about 95% collagen and 2% elastic fibers in their extracellular matrix. This composition presents similar elastic components which is paramount in wound contraction [9]....