2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sub- and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles for power generation from low-temperature/low-enthalpy geothermal wells, considering specific net power output and efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[128] In previous studies,V etter et al showedt hat significant performance improvementsw ere possible under supercritical conditions. [129] As tudy in Bayreuth comparedt he specific costs of sub-and supercritical cycles,a nd showed as horter paybackp eriod for as upercritical RC318 cycle than that for as ubcriticalc ycle of the same fluid ands pecific investment cost (SIC). [130] They concluded that as upercriticalm ode of operation had significant potential for increasing gross power at medium temperatures (130-160 8C).…”
Section: Tool Design For the Thermoeconomic Optimization Of Geothermamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[128] In previous studies,V etter et al showedt hat significant performance improvementsw ere possible under supercritical conditions. [129] As tudy in Bayreuth comparedt he specific costs of sub-and supercritical cycles,a nd showed as horter paybackp eriod for as upercritical RC318 cycle than that for as ubcriticalc ycle of the same fluid ands pecific investment cost (SIC). [130] They concluded that as upercriticalm ode of operation had significant potential for increasing gross power at medium temperatures (130-160 8C).…”
Section: Tool Design For the Thermoeconomic Optimization Of Geothermamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables are regarded as decision variables to conduct a single-objective optimization based on a genetic algorithm (GA). The net power output is chosen as optimization objective since the maximum value is desirable for a geothermal power system [29,30]. In this work, all the programs are written in MATLAB 2011b (The MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA), and the thermodynamic properties are attained from REFPROP 9.0 (NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA).…”
Section: System Components Modeling and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pinch point temperature difference showed to have a significant influence on the maximum net power output. A higher thermal efficiency of 10.1% is achieved when operating with supercritical vapour in the heat exchanger and using propane as working fluid [8]. As a continuation of the previous work and in order to determine the most compact design and obtain the highest efficiency, an evaluation of several types of heat exchangers such as double-pipe, shell-and-tube and plate heat exchangers operating only at supercritical conditions was made [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the heat transfer coefficients and the pressure drop show a similar trend and both increase by raising the heat flux and mass flow rate of the working fluid. Furthermore, numerical analysis on the net power output and efficiency at subcritical and supercritical operating conditions of a low-enthalpy geothermal (150 • C) ORC is done by examining 12 working fluids [8]. For the optimisation procedure, a counter-current heat exchanger with a pinch point temperature difference of 20 K is assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%