2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.11.011
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of subcutaneous and transdermal administration of buprenorphine for pre-emptive analgesia in dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to interindividual variability and the inability of dogs to verbally communicate pain, it is difficult to recognize and quantify pain in this species. Hence, in some methods of pain assessment, such as the UMPS, researchers have attempted to correlate pain with objective physiological data (Cambridge et al 2000;Moll et al 2011). However, this correlation can be influenced by many factors other than pain (Smith et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to interindividual variability and the inability of dogs to verbally communicate pain, it is difficult to recognize and quantify pain in this species. Hence, in some methods of pain assessment, such as the UMPS, researchers have attempted to correlate pain with objective physiological data (Cambridge et al 2000;Moll et al 2011). However, this correlation can be influenced by many factors other than pain (Smith et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, following completion of this transdermal fentanyl study, a small placebo‐controlled clinical trial of subcutaneously (SQ) administered buprenorphine (20 μg/kg every 6 h) for postoperative pain associated with ovariohysterectomy was reported that used a similar behaviorally based pain scale (23‐point University of Melbourne Pain Scale [UMPS] compared to the 20‐point GCPS) (Moll et al. , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of different routes of buprenorphine administration, including intravenous (i.v.) (Morgaz et al., ), subcutaneous (s.c.) (Moll, Fresno, Garcia, Prandi, & Andaluz, ), intramuscular (i.m.) (Linton, Wilson, Newbound, Freise, & Clark, ), transdermal (Moll et al., ), and oral transmucosal (Ko et al., ), have been previously studied in dogs, with the i.v.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%