Comparison of sucking patterns at introduction of oral feeding and at term in Israeli and American preterm infants

Bromiker, Ruben; Arad, Ilan; Loughran, Bernardette; Netzer, Dvorah; Kaplan, Michael; Medoff‐Cooper, Barbara

doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01891.x

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most excluded articles did not evaluate the moment of transition to oral feeding or the NB participants in the researches had already received oral feeding. The final sample included 29 articles, with 12 articles published between 2003 and 2007 (10,20,21,23,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) and 17 published between 2008 and 2012 (8,22,(24)(25)(26)(27)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the articles selected for screening, 41.2% (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)27,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52) of the ones from the MEDLINE research were included in the final analysis, 27.3% (10,26,42) from SciELO, and 18.7% (8,10,48) from LILACS. Of 29 publications, 86.2% were in English (20,21,(23)(24)(25)27,(34)(35)(36)(38)(39)(40)(41)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of 29 publications, 86.2% were in English (20,21,(23)(24)(25)27,(34)(35)(36)(38)(39)(40)(41)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52) and 13.8% in Portuguese (8,10,26,42) . No publications in Spanish were found.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In relation to the design of the selected studies, it was observed that 44.8% were clinical trials (13 studies) (10,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)34,41,51,52) , 31.0% were retrospective studies (9 studies) (8,35,37,40,(42)(43)(44)(45)50) , 20.7% were prospective studies (6 studies) (36,38,39,(46)(47)(48) , and 3.5% were cross-sectional studies (1 study) (49) . Therefore, it is observed that most studies consisted of clinical trials.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Preterm newborn readiness for oral feeding: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lima

Côrtes

Bouzada

et al. 2015

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE: To identify and systematize the main studies on the transition from enteral to oral feeding in preterm infants. RESEARCH STRATEGY: Articles that describe the transition from oral to enteral feeding in preterm infants were located in MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Original studies, with available abstract, published in the last 10 years were included. DATA ANALYSIS: Analysis of the methodology and the main results of the studies, and meta-analysis of the effects of sensory-motor-oral stimulation at the time of transition to full oral feeding and duration of hospitalization were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine national and international publications were considered. Most studies were clinical trials (44.8%) and did not use rating scales to start the transition process (82.7%). In the meta-analysis, positive effect of stimulation of the sensory-motor-oral system was observed with respect to the transition time to oral diet (p=0.0000), but not in relation to the length of hospital stay (p=0.09). However, heterogeneity between studies was found both in the analysis of the transition time to full oral feeding (I2=93.98) and in the length of hospital stay (I2=82.30). CONCLUSION: The transition to oral feeding is an important moment, and various physical and clinical characteristics of preterm infants have been used to describe this process. Despite the impossibility of generalizing the results due to the heterogeneity of the studies, we have noted the importance of strategies for stimulation of sensory-motor-oral system to decrease the period of transition to full oral feeding system.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Preterm newborn readiness for oral feeding: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lima

Côrtes

Bouzada

et al. 2015

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The sucking of preterm newborns (PTNB) have been studied in relation to the mechanisms and components, effects of non-nutritive sucking (NNS) stimulation and the beginning of oral feeding (Rocha, 2002;Medoff-Cooper et al, 2002;Bühler, 2003;Bühler e Limongi, 2004a;Caetano et al, 2003;Neiva, 2003;McCain, 2003;Fucile et al, 2005;Bromiker et al, 2005; Neiva e Leone, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolução do ritmo de sucção e influência da estimulação em prematuros

Neiva

Leone

2007

Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: the sucking development pattern of the preterm newborn (PTNB) in the neonatal period is important for an effective sucking and oral motor development. The establishment of a safe and efficient feeding in pre-term newborns is related to a rhythmic and coordinated sucking. Nonnutritive sucking stimulation can have an influence on the development of sucking and the development of sucking rhythm of pre-term newborns. Aim: to analyze the development of the sucking rhythm, in non-nutritive and nutritive sucking in preterm newborns, as a consequence of non-nutritive sucking stimulation and in terms of corrected gestational age. Method: 95 preterm newborns randomly divided in three groups: Group 1, control group (35 PTNB), did not receive non-nutritive sucking stimulation; Group 2 (30 PTNB), received non-nutritive sucking stimulation using an orthodontic pacifier for premature infants (Nuk®); and Group 3 (30 PTNB), received non-nutritive sucking stimulation using a gloved finger. Results: the mean gestational age was of 30.5 weeks (± 1.57), the mean corrected gestational age at the moment of enrollment in the study was of 31.6 weeks (± 1.31), and the mean birth weight was of 1.390 grams, with no statistical differences between the groups. The number of sucking bursts and pauses per minute increased by 0.16 per week and the duration of the bursts by 0.81 seconds; the duration of pauses decreased by 3.8 seconds per week while the number of sucks/second was constant, 1.15 and 0.95 for non-nutritive and nutritive sucking, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for any of the studied variables. Conclusion: the stimulation of non-nutritive suction in preterm newborns did not modify the post-natal development of sucking rhythm. The process of maturation, represented by the corrected gestational age, was considered the most responsible factor for this process. Key Words: Sucking Behavior; Newborn; Premature; Feeding Methods. R e s u m oTema: o desenvolvimento do padrão de sucção em recém-nascido pré-termo no período neonatal é importante não só para o estabelecimento de uma sucção eficiente, mas também para o desenvolvimento motor-oral. A alimentação segura e eficiente do recém-nascido pré-termo está relacionada a uma sucção com ritmo e coordenação. A estimulação da sucção não-nutritiva pode influenciar a evolução do padrão de sucção e o desenvolvimento do ritmo de sucção nos recém-nascidos pré-termo. Objetivo: analisar a evolução do ritmo de sucção, na sucção não-nutritiva e na sucção nutritiva, em função da estimulação da sucção não-nutritiva e do avanço da idade gestacional corrigida. Método: foram envolvidos 95 recém-nascidos pré-termo (RNPT) distribuídos de forma aleatória em três grupos: Grupo 1, grupo controle (35 RNPT), sem estimulação da sucção não-nutritiva; Grupo 2 (30 RNPT), com estimulação da sucção não-nutritiva com chupeta ortodôntica para prematuros Nuk® e Grupo 3 (30 RNPT), com estimulação da sucção não-nutritiva por meio do dedo enluvado. Result...

show abstract