1998
DOI: 10.1071/pp96103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sudden heat stress with gradual exposure to high temperature during grain filling in two wheat varieties differing in heat tolerance. II. Fractional protein accumulation

Abstract: Two varieties of wheat differing in heat tolerance (cvv. Egret and Oxley, tolerant and sensitive, respectively) were exposed to either a sudden or gradual (6°C h -1 ) increase from 20 to 40°C to determine if the rate of temperature increase used in controlled-environment studies (1) alters the accumulation of functionally important proteins during grain-filling, and (2) affects the ability to discriminate between heat tolerant and sensitive varieties of wheat. After heat treatment, grain samples were taken thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gradual increase and then decrease in the temperature of the phytotrons mimics the actual situation encountered by heat‐stressed plants under natural conditions. This has been proved more efficient than the sudden increase in studying the effect of heat stress on wheat (Stone and Nicolas 1998) and led to clear variations among genotypes. Relative humidity was always in the range of 30–60 % during the period of the heat‐stress treatment although it was not controlled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradual increase and then decrease in the temperature of the phytotrons mimics the actual situation encountered by heat‐stressed plants under natural conditions. This has been proved more efficient than the sudden increase in studying the effect of heat stress on wheat (Stone and Nicolas 1998) and led to clear variations among genotypes. Relative humidity was always in the range of 30–60 % during the period of the heat‐stress treatment although it was not controlled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst grain protein content increases under heat stress, the functionality of protein significantly decreases (Corbellini et al, 1997), affecting end-use quality. Total grain protein content of the crop decreases under heat stress because heat stress decreases grain yield (Stone and Nicolas, 1998;Castro et al, 2007). Heat stress also decreases the duration, but not rate, of protein deposition in the grain (Castro et al, 2007).…”
Section: E Grain Qualitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Heat stress during grain-filling phase affects the grain protein contents (Wardlaw et al, 2002;Gooding et al, 2003) through reductions in starch deposition, which influences protein concentration by allowing more nitrogen per unit of starch (Stone and Nicolas, 1998). Although the daily flow of carbon and nitrogen into grain increases with increasing temperature, carbon flow decreases per degree-day (Wardlaw et al, 1980;Daniel and Triboi, 2000).…”
Section: E Grain Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High temperatures during grain filling have been reported to significantly increase grain protein content but, in contrast, decrease protein functionality (Corbellini et al. 1997, Stone and Nicolas 1998). High temperature affects the gliadin to glutenin ratio, the degree of complex protein aggregates formation and the amount of heat shock proteins produced (Blumenthal et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%