2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide in children and young people in care and non-care populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
75
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A distinct factor contributing to the risk of suicide attempt for the North Korean respondents was household type (i.e., living with friends, alone, or in a dormitory or living in a facility). Previous studies have also found that household type was associated with the risk of suicidal behaviors; for example, one recent study [19] found that children and adolescents in care settings (e.g., foster care, kinship care, and so on) had higher risk of suicide attempt. This increased risk could be explained by these children's relatively high exposure to risk factors such as physical or sexual abuse, neglect, or family disorganization [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinct factor contributing to the risk of suicide attempt for the North Korean respondents was household type (i.e., living with friends, alone, or in a dormitory or living in a facility). Previous studies have also found that household type was associated with the risk of suicidal behaviors; for example, one recent study [19] found that children and adolescents in care settings (e.g., foster care, kinship care, and so on) had higher risk of suicide attempt. This increased risk could be explained by these children's relatively high exposure to risk factors such as physical or sexual abuse, neglect, or family disorganization [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research continues to depict a bleak future for looked after children; predicting inauspicious health and social outcomes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Although, research in LAC is still limited; poor outcomes associated with mental health, disability, suicide, criminal system involvement, teenage parenthood, substance misuse and educational attainment have become the predicted 'norm' for these children [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. These discouraging findings have prompted governments to address these concerns; positioning this population at the forefront of policy and legislation [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos estudios evidencian dificultades en áreas como la educación, la inserción laboral, los ingresos económicos, el acceso a la vivienda, la salud mental, las conductas suicidas, el abuso de substancias y las conductas delictivas. Los datos señalan el alto nivel de vulnerabilidad de esta población, con peores resultados que los obtenidos por niños procedentes de familias pobres (para revisión consultar, Gypen, Vanderfaeillie, De Maeyer, Belenger, & Van Holen, 2017;Kääriälä, & Hiilamo, 2017;Evans, White, Turley, Slater, Morgan, Strange, & Scourfield, 2017). Resultados similares han sido observados en estudios con población española (Bernal & Melendro, 2014;Bravo & Fernández del Valle, 2003;Martin, Muñoz, Rodríguez, & Pérez, 2008;Montserrat, Cases, & Bertran, 2013;Oriol-Granado, Sala-Roca, & Filella, 2014, 2015Sainero, Del Valle, & Bravo, 2015;Sala-Roca, Jariot, Villaba, & Rodríguez, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified