2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of supine-only and REM-only obstructive sleep apnoea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed roughly 5.5% of patients suffering from OSA presented a pure REM-dependent phenotype, while, some studies suggested that the prevalence of this phenotype might be higher, reaching up to 10% 21 . This lower prevalence of REM-OSA phenotype might be related to strict inclusion criteria for this group that we used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Our study showed roughly 5.5% of patients suffering from OSA presented a pure REM-dependent phenotype, while, some studies suggested that the prevalence of this phenotype might be higher, reaching up to 10% 21 . This lower prevalence of REM-OSA phenotype might be related to strict inclusion criteria for this group that we used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Nevertheless, this study may have been susceptible to some population bias as the patients are of a single ethnic background with a high male to female ratio (6:1). Depending on the definition and the severity classification of POSA, previous studies have reported a male to female prevalence ratio of 2.5:1 vs. 5:1 (Vagiakis et al, 2006;Gillman et al, 2012;Joosten et al, 2012) and even up to 10.3:1 (O'Connor et al, 2000). Furthermore, PSG parameters can vary from night to night (Levendowski et al, 2009), nevertheless it is a common and acceptable practice to make treatment decisions based on the results of a single night PSG, as done in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The inconsistency in definition criteria continues; for example, the prevalence of POSA has widely varied in different studies ranging from 23-30% to 9-60% depending on the definitions used (Cartwright et al, 1985;Mador et al, 2005;Mo et al, 2011;Gillman et al, 2012;Joosten et al, 2012;Teerapraipruk et al, 2012;Schiza et al, 2015). Therefore, more accurate characterization of subgroups of POSA may help developing a unified set of diagnostic criteria and thereby facilitating the development of optimized and targeted treatment strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been emphasized that AHI REM should be at least 2 times higher than AHI NREM ; however different values have been reported for AHI N-REM (AHI NREM <5 or <10) (11,14,15). In studies that used diagnostic criteria similar to ours, AHI have ranged between 10% and 13% (16,17 Because of differences in the definition criteria, in cases with REM-related OSAS, clinical characteristics also demonstrate differences. In many studies, a higher incidence of REM-related OSAS has been reported in women (3,6,12,13,19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%