Comparison of Support Vector Machine and Random Forest Algorithms for Invasive and Expansive Species Classification Using Airborne Hyperspectral Data

Abstract

Invasive and expansive plant species are considered a threat to natural biodiversity because of their high adaptability and low habitat requirements. Species investigated in this research, including Solidago spp., Calamagrostis epigejos, and Rubus spp., are successfully displacing native vegetation and claiming new areas, which in turn severely decreases natural ecosystem richness, as they rapidly encroach on protected areas (e.g., Natura 2000 habitats). Because of the damage caused, the European Union (EU) has committed all its member countries to monitor biodiversity. In this paper we compared two machine learning algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF), to identify Solidago spp., Calamagrostis epigejos, and Rubus spp. on HySpex hyperspectral aerial images. SVM and RF are reliable and well-known classifiers that achieve satisfactory results in the literature. Data sets containing 30, 50, 100, 200, and 300 pixels per class in the training data set were used to train SVM and RF classifiers. The classifications were performed on 430-spectral bands and on the most informative 30 bands extracted using the Minimum Noise Fraction (MNF) transformation. As a result, maps of the spatial distribution of analyzed species were achieved; high accuracies were observed for all data sets and classifiers (an average F1 score above 0.78). The highest accuracies were obtained using 30 MNF bands and 300 sample pixels per class in the training data set (average F1 score > 0.9). Lower training data set sample sizes resulted in decreased average F1 scores, up to 13 percentage points in the case of 30-pixel samples per class.

A Hybrid Model for Load Balancing in Cloud Using File Type Formatting

“…Experiments are conducted on small datasets and overall accuracy in the competitors is less than 80%. A study by [86] suggested the classification of three expansive plant species using SVM and RF for their accurate identification of hyperspectral images. However, in this study, a low F1 score is achieved even when a small number of training sets are used.…”

Multi-Temporal Sentinel-2 Data in Classification of Mountain Vegetation

“…Recently, non-parametric classifiers are increasingly employed in vegetation classification [4][5][6][7][8] because of their more flexible approach to training data use than in parametric classifiers,…”

Introducing GEOBIA to Landscape Imageability Assessment: A Multi-Temporal Case Study of the Nature Reserve “Kózki”, Poland

“…The classification procedure was conducted with the use of e-Cognition Developer as an automated process, along with a classification error matrix [92] and accuracy assessment summary including overall, user, and producer accuracy and Kappa measure [93]. Automation of the classification process allowed us to test several of the most popular classifiers implemented in e-Cognition: random forest (RF) [94], support vector machine (SVM) [95,96], and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [97]. Each classifier received the same input parameters: brightness, degree of skeleton branching, curvature, and textures after Haralick [98] (GLCM homogeneity, entropy, mean, dissimilarity).…”