In this issue of JAMA Dermatology, Cheraghlou et al 1 compare the survival of patients with stage I melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and wide local excision (WLE) in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The treatment of melanoma with MMS has historically been the subject of controversy, with physicians on either side deeply entrenched in their views. The investigators' finding that patients undergoing MMS have improved survival, although relatively novel, is not surprising.Exceptional outcomes have been reported by several single-institution studies for MMS, especially with respect to local recurrence rates. [2][3][4] In addition, improvement in overall survival for patients with melanoma treated with MMS compared with historical controls treated with WLE was noted as early as 1997. 5 However, critics of MMS for melanoma have appropriately noted that single-institution studies focusing on MMS for melanoma are limited by poor generalizability and are unable to provide adequate comparisons with WLE because of the potential for significant unadjusted confounding. Studies with data generated from population-based databases can mitigate some of these concerns.Previous database analyses and population cohort studies [6][7][8] have shown a nonsignificant trend toward a melanoma-specific survival advantage for patients with earlystage melanoma undergoing MMS and have yet to demonstrate a survival disadvantage for any stage of melanoma. The recent analysis of stages I and II melanomas in the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 by Elias and Lambert 8 demonstrated no difference in survival between MMS and WLE groups. In their 2018 study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, Trofymenko et al 6 demonstrated that patients undergoing MMS for facial melanoma had a higher overall survival rate than patients undergoing wide (margins ≥1 cm) or narrow (margins <1 cm) margin excision. Although no statistically significant melanoma-specific survival advantage was found, MMS was at least equivalent to conventional excision with respect to melanoma-specific survival. 6 An earlier analysis of the Alberta Cancer Registry by Chin-Lenn et al 7 showed statistically nonsignificant decreases in local and regional recurrence and improved disease-specific survival with MMS relative to WLE. These database studies add to abundant retrospective data from a growing number of institutions demonstrating excellent oncologic outcomes for MMS and staged excision with complete margin assessment of melanomas, particularly head and neck melanomas of the lentigo maligna subtype. 2,3,9 Although forms of complete peripheral and deep margin assessment (CPDMA) such as MMS and staged exci-