2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2012.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of survival and regional failure between accelerated partial breast irradiation and whole breast irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meta‐analysis, patients who received APBI had equivalent SF (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.55–2.04; p = 0.853) compared with patients who received WBI, there was no statistically significant difference between group APBI and group WBI (Table ). Six eligible studies reported the data regarding DM. In the meta‐analysis, patients who received APBI had equivalent DM (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.45–1.08; p = 0.104) compared with patients who received WBI, there was no statistically significant difference between group APBI and group WBI (Table ). Eight eligible studies reported the data regarding OS. In the meta‐analysis, patients who received APBI had equivalent OS (OR = 0.88; 95% CI AA = 0.73–1.06; p = 0.177) compared with patients who received WBI, there was no statistically significant difference between group APBI and group WBI (Table ). Six eligible studies reported the data regarding DFS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the meta‐analysis, patients who received APBI had equivalent SF (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.55–2.04; p = 0.853) compared with patients who received WBI, there was no statistically significant difference between group APBI and group WBI (Table ). Six eligible studies reported the data regarding DM. In the meta‐analysis, patients who received APBI had equivalent DM (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.45–1.08; p = 0.104) compared with patients who received WBI, there was no statistically significant difference between group APBI and group WBI (Table ). Eight eligible studies reported the data regarding OS. In the meta‐analysis, patients who received APBI had equivalent OS (OR = 0.88; 95% CI AA = 0.73–1.06; p = 0.177) compared with patients who received WBI, there was no statistically significant difference between group APBI and group WBI (Table ). Six eligible studies reported the data regarding DFS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2,606 articles were identified by MEDLINE search, 1250 by EMBASE, and 117 by Cochrane Library. Among them, 11 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria . The search was illustrated in a flow diagram in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Real-time, imageguided brachytherapy (IGBT) now provides excellent conformal RT and is a clear alternative to EBRT in many tumor localizations. Indeed, the use of BT for prostate cancer (both HDR and seeds) and, more recently, for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), is strong and growing stronger [10,11].…”
Section: Promisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sie ist jedoch jetzt schon eine Option bei Patientinnen, bei denen eine Homogenbestrahlung der gesamten Brust aus unterschiedlichsten Gründen (z.B. bei radiogener Vorbelastung oder bei entsprechender Komorbidität) nicht möglich ist (28,29), wobei in jüngster Zeit auch die interstitielle Multikatheter-Brachytherapie an Bedeutung zu gewinnen scheint (30,31).…”
Section: Fazit Für Die Praxisunclassified