Objectives: This study addresses the limited body of literature concerning the impact of photobiomodulation on complications following mandibular third molar extractions. Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical studies that reported the use of photobiomodulation after mandibular third molar surgery was conducted based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations. The formulation of research questions followed the PICO model, and comprehensive strategies for record search and study selection were devised. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (The Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no CRD42024511892). Two independent reviewers consulted four databases during the literature search: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane Library databases without imposing any date restrictions. A search on the grey literature was carried out too (OpenGrey). Duplicate articles were eliminated. Results: After the initial screening, 18 studies were retained to be screened by the reviewers. The full texts of the identified studies were scrutinized for original data, and their related references were manually retrieved and checked for additional relevant studies. The available studies exhibit considerable heterogeneity, exploring various factors related to postoperative outcomes. Our meta-analysis primarily focuses on three key aspects: the incidence of alveolar osteitis (AO), mucosa repair/alveolar pocket healing, and bone repair. The resultant CI of the VAS scale was 98 to 99%. Conclusions: This meta-analysis underscores the need for further research in this domain, highlighting the existing heterogeneity among studies and the importance of a nuanced understanding of photobiomodulation’s multifaceted effects on postoperative complications.
