2020
DOI: 10.1080/1573062x.2020.1776737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter agrees with similar studies that found the suction head parameter to be insensitive in SWMM-LID modules (Krebs et al 2016;Randall et al 2020). The most sensitive parameters were found to be the hydraulic conductivity slope, the field capacity and the porosity of the soil layer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The latter agrees with similar studies that found the suction head parameter to be insensitive in SWMM-LID modules (Krebs et al 2016;Randall et al 2020). The most sensitive parameters were found to be the hydraulic conductivity slope, the field capacity and the porosity of the soil layer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The SWMM-LID module, hereafter referred to as the SWMM-PP model, is a simplified physically based model. It has been applied in many PP studies (Kim et al 2015;Chui et al 2016;Xie et al 2017;Randall et al 2020). Most of the studies applied the SWMM-PP model of PP using parameters selected from the SWMM manual without calibration, and only a few studies were found to evaluate the accuracy of SWMM-PP models with measured data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, sanding during winter maintenance should be avoided. The long-term infiltration performance is single-handedly the largest drawback of PA as it tends to become clogged by sand and fine material over time, which lowers the infiltration capacity and, thereby, the performance [18][19][20]. Støvring et al [20] evaluated the restoration cleaning effect on nine PP systems in Denmark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%