2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07474-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of synchronous bilateral transperitoneal and posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: results of a multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that the classic retroperitoneoscopic approach has technical advantages in case of BA since it enables to avoid the reposition of the patient leading to shorter operative time with comparable outcomes to transperitoneal approach [48].…”
Section: Robot-assisted Bilateral Adrenalectomymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe that the classic retroperitoneoscopic approach has technical advantages in case of BA since it enables to avoid the reposition of the patient leading to shorter operative time with comparable outcomes to transperitoneal approach [48].…”
Section: Robot-assisted Bilateral Adrenalectomymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Anyway, to date, consistent data of a potential superiority of the robotic over the laparoscopic technique are lacking. Bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy has proven to be feasible and safe by several studies [47,48] and to date, still being the gold standard approach. Overall, the same considerations made for unilateral RA are likely to be valid even for robotic BA.…”
Section: Robot-assisted Bilateral Adrenalectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have compared the surgical outcomes of LTA and PRA. These reports demonstrated clinically equivalent out- www.e-enm.org 777 comes, with a smaller tumor size, less estimated blood loss (EBL), a shorter time to oral intake, and a shorter length of hospital stay in the PRA group (Table 1) [19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. A recent metaanalysis reported significant differences in demographic characteristics and surgical outcomes between LTA and PRA groups.…”
Section: Comparison Of Surgical Outcomes Between Lta and Pramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of which mainly concerns the risk of malignancy or the future recurrences from the remnant, potential for di culty of reoperation and complications, and likelihood of corticosteroid-independence to be balanced against the risks associated with chronically treated adrenal cortical insu ciency after CSA, and the inconsistent evidence of retrospective studies of small sample size. Recently, several international multicentre studies revealed the results showed that laparoscopic/open operative CSA (LCSA/OCSA) should be the successful surgical approach of choice for patients with hereditary bPHEO [1][2][3]12] . In particular, the bilateral LCSA (B-LCSA) approach should be considered a viable alternative option for these patients requiring surgical intervention [1][2][3][4][10][11][12][13][14] .However, simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic or open CSA (i.e., SB-LCSA or SB-OCSA) for bPHEO associated with MEN2, less practical experience has been reported so far [1-4,10−22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several international multicentre studies revealed the results showed that laparoscopic/open operative CSA (LCSA/OCSA) should be the successful surgical approach of choice for patients with hereditary bPHEO [1][2][3]12] . In particular, the bilateral LCSA (B-LCSA) approach should be considered a viable alternative option for these patients requiring surgical intervention [1][2][3][4][10][11][12][13][14] .However, simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic or open CSA (i.e., SB-LCSA or SB-OCSA) for bPHEO associated with MEN2, less practical experience has been reported so far [1-4,10−22] . In the present study, 31 patients who had bPHEO originating from MEN2 in Ethnic Han Chinese, of whom 29 underwent a variety of bilateral CSA including synchronous/metachronous, LCSA/OCSA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%