2017
DOI: 10.4274/tjcd.32767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of T and N Staging on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Postoperative Histopathologic Specimens in Rectum Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, (1) the initial staging method pre-nCRT by MRI is notably inaccurate compared with the final staging method, with histopathological examination of the resected rectum remaining the gold standard for ypT-staging and ypN-staging post-nCRT). While MRI accuracy for mT3-staging compared with final histopathology is estimated to be 60%−80%, [17][18][19] accuracy for staging N-negative tumours is only 38%−54% and 48%−71% for N-positive tumours 17,19 (notably, this inaccuracy is particularly relevant in watch-and-wait studies where a definitive histopathology result may be unavailable) and ( 2) methods to assess tumour regression grade (TRG) are not consistent across studies and are scored subjectively. 2,[20][21][22] Further, assessment of nodal regression and downstaging is notoriously difficult, with nodal categorisation often simplified to ypN+ve or ypN-ve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, (1) the initial staging method pre-nCRT by MRI is notably inaccurate compared with the final staging method, with histopathological examination of the resected rectum remaining the gold standard for ypT-staging and ypN-staging post-nCRT). While MRI accuracy for mT3-staging compared with final histopathology is estimated to be 60%−80%, [17][18][19] accuracy for staging N-negative tumours is only 38%−54% and 48%−71% for N-positive tumours 17,19 (notably, this inaccuracy is particularly relevant in watch-and-wait studies where a definitive histopathology result may be unavailable) and ( 2) methods to assess tumour regression grade (TRG) are not consistent across studies and are scored subjectively. 2,[20][21][22] Further, assessment of nodal regression and downstaging is notoriously difficult, with nodal categorisation often simplified to ypN+ve or ypN-ve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%