2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of techniques for detecting metal contamination in silicon wafers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally suited for this are wafers as produced and used in the semiconductor industry. Therefore it is not surprising that most applications of surface and thin-layer analysis are found in this field [7,8,87]. TXRF instrumentation has been tailored since the 1990's for wafer control initially using only surface scanning, but more recently also for subsurface analysis.…”
Section: Surface and Thin-layer Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally suited for this are wafers as produced and used in the semiconductor industry. Therefore it is not surprising that most applications of surface and thin-layer analysis are found in this field [7,8,87]. TXRF instrumentation has been tailored since the 1990's for wafer control initially using only surface scanning, but more recently also for subsurface analysis.…”
Section: Surface and Thin-layer Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal impurities in silicon substrates are a critical factor that must be rigorously controlled during silicon wafer fabrication. Metal particles in ionic form exhibit high mobility within semiconductor silicon substrates, which can cause significant damage to the electrical performance and long-term reliability of silicon-based semiconductor devices [ 1 , 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of imaging technologies, the detection of low-level metallic contamination has become a compulsory research area to control the reliability and performance of devices. [1,2] Early detection of unexpected metallic contaminants during device fabrication is key to avoid yield losses and secure the manufacturing line. [3,4] However, most of the techniques used to detect contamination share at least one of the major problems: the detection limit of the technique is too high (e.g., EDX); the technique is only sensitive to surface (e.g., TXRF) or volume (e.g., SPV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%