1996
DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.1996.0440511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Techniques for Determining the Fractal Dimensions of Clay Minerals

Abstract: Abstract---Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), adsorption and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques were used to determine the fractal dimensions (D) of 3 natural reference clays: 1) a kaolinite (KGa-2); 2) a hectorite (SHCa-1), and 3) a Ca-montmorillonite (STx-1). The surfaces of these clays were found to be fractal with D values close to 2.0. This is consistent with the common description of clay mineral surfaces as smooth and planar. Some surface irregularities were observed for hectorite and Camontm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The smooth nature of the Georgia kaolinite surface is further supported by the work of Malekani et al (1996) who determined that the fractal dimension of highly crystallized Georgia kaolinite was --2.0, indicating a flat or smooth surface. Sokolowska et al (1989) have also reported a fractal dimension of 2.12 for particles of Georgia kaolinite.…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The smooth nature of the Georgia kaolinite surface is further supported by the work of Malekani et al (1996) who determined that the fractal dimension of highly crystallized Georgia kaolinite was --2.0, indicating a flat or smooth surface. Sokolowska et al (1989) have also reported a fractal dimension of 2.12 for particles of Georgia kaolinite.…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Important questions connected with clay dispersions have been those of size/shape of individual particles and their aggregates [5], influence of salt and temperature [6] or concentration [7] on the ability of clay suspensions to form gel-like structures and granules, and the dynamics of layered silicate crystallization [8]. For the solid-like clay structures, studies have been made on the intercalation of metal ions within the interlayers of clay platelets [9], on the heterogeneity of stacks of platelets in the dehydrated state [10], and on the variation in surface fractal dimension between different natural clays [11]. Compared to X-rays, neutrons have the advantage that SANS data may reflect more accurately the dimensionality of matrix-pore interfaces [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been largely used to observe natural soil aggregates (Remley and Bradford, 1989;Sullivan, 1990;Robertson and Eggleton, 1991;Watanabe et al, 1992;Boer and Crosby, 1995;Jeong, 1998;Harris and Hollien, 2000;Laird, 2001) and also applied to inorganic soil components and their associations. Malekani et al (1996) used this technique in a study of the fractal dimension of clay minerals. Associations of aluminium -iron species with silica particles (Taylor et al, 1990) and with clay minerals (Sakurai et al, 1990) and complexes of copper ions and iron-oxidecoated sand (Lai et al, 2000) have also been described by SEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%