2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1500-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of techniques for measuring anterior chamber depth: Orbscan imaging, Smith’s technique, and van Herick’s method

Abstract: Smith's technique (constant 1.31) provided an ACD that is closer to that found with Orbscan compared to a constant of 1.40 or LCDvh. Our findings also suggest that Smith's technique would produce values closer to that obtained with Orbscan by using a constant of 1.22.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of the slit beam with the two images in contact is multiplied by a constant, commonly 1.4 or 1.31, to obtain a value for ACD in millimetres. Both of these techniques are imprecise – one study estimated that Van Herick's method often overestimated grade while Smith's often overestimated ACD (Eperjesi & Holden ) – but they provide a sense of a patient's risk for angle closure without requiring gonioscopy.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the slit beam with the two images in contact is multiplied by a constant, commonly 1.4 or 1.31, to obtain a value for ACD in millimetres. Both of these techniques are imprecise – one study estimated that Van Herick's method often overestimated grade while Smith's often overestimated ACD (Eperjesi & Holden ) – but they provide a sense of a patient's risk for angle closure without requiring gonioscopy.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Pentacam does not require extensive experience for image acquisition, while AS-OCT always causes an image degradation due to a motion artifact secondary to the patient's microsaccades [12]. Additionally, the Orbscan device requires clear re ections from the epithelial and endothelial corneal surfaces to obtain precise data, which might be di cult after the surgery [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods for ACD measurement, including ultrasonic devices and optically based instruments. In order to several complications of the conventional method of ultrasonic wave, like patient discomfort, risk of infection and off-axis measurements, the new instruments using optical devices are seems to have an important role in ACD measurement [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the practical and mostly reliable methods for ACD measurement is Orbscan II [5]. The other methods applied are optical coherence tomography (OCT) like Visante OCT, optical methods as IOL Master, and scheimpflug imaging techniques as Pentacam or Galilei [6,7]. On the other hand, methods applied in the clinic using the slit lamp like grading of limbal chamber depth using van Herick's technique is also used as a surrogate for measuring central ACD [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%