2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of temporomandibular joint and ramus morphology between class II and class III cases before and after bi-maxillary osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportions of anteriorly positioned condyles decreased only minimally. This finding is in accordance with the previous research of Kim et al [43,44], Iguchi et al [45], and Choi et al [46,47]. In the maxillary single-jaw surgery group, the condyles were positioned anteriorly or concentrically before the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The proportions of anteriorly positioned condyles decreased only minimally. This finding is in accordance with the previous research of Kim et al [43,44], Iguchi et al [45], and Choi et al [46,47]. In the maxillary single-jaw surgery group, the condyles were positioned anteriorly or concentrically before the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Orthognathic surgery in patients with facial deformity has an impact on the TMJ morphology and position, as well as on the masticatory muscles and surrounding soft tissues [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occlusal force was measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, using the Dental Prescale System according to previous studies 20,21. Intra class correlation coefficients >0.92 indicated high consistency and reproducibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography condition was FC21, and window level was determined from 200 to 2000, similarly to the previous method. [18][19][20] Computed tomography image analysis software (Simplant O and O; Materialize) was used to measure CT value (pixel value). Computed tomography values of the lateral and medial cortex were measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively by using horizontal planes at the mandibular foramen level (upper level) and 10 mm under the mandibular foramen level (lower level) parallel to the Frankfurt horizontal plane.…”
Section: Ct Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%