1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70007-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Tensile Strength of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Closure of Lacerations Versus Suture Closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 On the other hand, cyanoacrylate alone for wound closure has exhibited significantly less tensile strength than closure with traditional suture methods. 22 This is in agreement with our clinical observations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…21 On the other hand, cyanoacrylate alone for wound closure has exhibited significantly less tensile strength than closure with traditional suture methods. 22 This is in agreement with our clinical observations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Average cost per wound closure was very high with staples v/s sutures, 2,6 tensile strength 7 and fibroblastic proliferation and collagination observed higher with sutures v/s staples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O butil-cianoacrilato 32 e o octil-cianoacrilato, 33 se comparados ao fio de sutura 5-0, apresentaram uma resistência à tensão, semelhante ao fio de sutura. Os cianoacrilatos somente são eficazes em feridas profundas, até que estes estejam associados a suturas subcutâneas, 34 embora, quando há uma ferida, em regiões de baixa tensão, os adesivos de cianoacrilato são os materiais de escolha para este tipo de síntese.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified