2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Accuracy of CT Volume Calculated by Circumscription to Prolate Ellipsoid Volume (Bidimensional Measurement Multiplied by Coronal Long Axis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the manual circumscription, radiologists used the automatic 3D tool to measure the tumor and then manually adjusted the measurements by tracing the tumor on CT. The study found that manual circumscription was more accurate than PEVC [14]. This method of tumor measurement as described by manual circumscription is very similar to the method used to measure the implanted mesh in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In the manual circumscription, radiologists used the automatic 3D tool to measure the tumor and then manually adjusted the measurements by tracing the tumor on CT. The study found that manual circumscription was more accurate than PEVC [14]. This method of tumor measurement as described by manual circumscription is very similar to the method used to measure the implanted mesh in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…who demonstrated that PDAs are not spherical in shape and their respective spherical volumes calculated from RECIST overestimate contoured volumes. 5 Other groups have demonstrated the same findings in patients with liver metastases 11 and in studies with phantom ellipsoids 41013 . Also, volumetric analysis has been shown to be more accurate in predicting actual tumor size compared with RECIST in these phantom ellipsoid studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…All 3-dimensional ultrasound and ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed and/or interpreted by experienced Fetal Center radiologists blinded to the fetuses' clinical outcome. Fetal weight was estimated by ultrasound using the Hadlock formula; and tumor volume was measured by ultrasound or MRI using the greatest dimensions of length, width, and depth to calculate a prolate ellipsoid [8][9][10]. With these 2 parameters, the TFR was obtained by dividing the calculated total tumor volume by the estimated fetal weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%