2020 International Conference on Biomedical Innovations and Applications (BIA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/bia50171.2020.9244278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the accuracy of SVM kemel functions in text classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the classification performance comparisons of four algorithms when increasing attributes. Furthermore, the results from each function in this approach give a similar trend result of Bui et al [2012], Ravi [2016] and Kalcheva et al [2020], which is reported that the linear function had better performance than the radial basis function, sigmoid function, and polynomial function. Due to linear function is the best function to deal with the linear data type and binary and multiply class [Fan et al, 2008], while radial basis function, polynomial function and sigmoid function are powerful ability to classify the nonlinear data and s curve data type [Keskes and Braham, 2014].…”
Section: Selected Algorithm For Classification Approach Developmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Figure 6 shows the classification performance comparisons of four algorithms when increasing attributes. Furthermore, the results from each function in this approach give a similar trend result of Bui et al [2012], Ravi [2016] and Kalcheva et al [2020], which is reported that the linear function had better performance than the radial basis function, sigmoid function, and polynomial function. Due to linear function is the best function to deal with the linear data type and binary and multiply class [Fan et al, 2008], while radial basis function, polynomial function and sigmoid function are powerful ability to classify the nonlinear data and s curve data type [Keskes and Braham, 2014].…”
Section: Selected Algorithm For Classification Approach Developmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Where 𝛼 is the scaling parameter of the sample while 𝑟 is the shifting parameter for threshold mapping of the transpose 𝑇 of the two points 𝑥 and 𝑦. More information on the kernels can be found in [17]- [19].…”
Section: 𝑘(𝑥 𝑦) = 𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ (𝛼 𝑥𝑇 𝑦 + 𝑟 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table VIII describes the prediction performance of the proposed crime type prediction models. In addition, for performance comparison, SVM with polynomial kernel function of degree 2, and Bernoulli Naïve Bayes algorithms are also considered [29]- [30]. The table describes the computed values of performance evaluation parameters including accuracy, precision, recall and F1-Score.…”
Section: A Crime Type Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%