1987
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91033-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the acute hemodynamic response to intravenous nisoldipine (bay k 5552) and intravenous nifedipine for left ventricular dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in heart rate is in line with previous experimental [29] and clinical reports [8][9][10], but at variance with Lewis et al [27] who showed no significant increase in heart rate with nisoldipine. The increase in heart rate is in line with previous experimental [29] and clinical reports [8][9][10], but at variance with Lewis et al [27] who showed no significant increase in heart rate with nisoldipine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase in heart rate is in line with previous experimental [29] and clinical reports [8][9][10], but at variance with Lewis et al [27] who showed no significant increase in heart rate with nisoldipine. The increase in heart rate is in line with previous experimental [29] and clinical reports [8][9][10], but at variance with Lewis et al [27] who showed no significant increase in heart rate with nisoldipine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, in an isolated heart preparation, nisoldipine exerted less negative inotropic effects than nifedipine and thus showed relative specificity for dilatation of the coronary arteries [1][2][3]. This finding has been clinically confirmed in patients with left ventricular dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction in whom nisoldipine proved to be superior to nifedipine in improving LVEF [10]. In a recent study in ten patients with cardiac failure, nisoldipine showed a useful acute hemodynamic profile by increasing forward blood flow and reducing myocardial oxygen demand [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, nisotdipine is 100 times more vascular selective than nifedipine and is the most vascular selective of the currently available CCBs [11]. Nisoldipine, therefore, has the capacity to lower blood pressure without affecting the functioning of either the myocardium or skeletal muscle and does not produce the negative inotropic effects that occur with some other CCBs, such as nifedipine [12,13]. There is some evidence from in vitro studies, particularly using porcine artery preparations, that nisoldipine preferentially acts on the coronary rather than the peripheral vasculature, especially when the former is in a depolarized state, such as occurs during periods of ischemia [12,14,15].…”
Section: Nisoldipinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effects of nisoldipine on myocardial contractility in isolated systems are controversial [6]. In clinical studies nisoldipine proved to be effective in the treatment of coronary artery disease [7,8]; in heart failure, however, favorable effects of nisoldipine were not found by all investigators [9][10][11].Vasodilation of epicardial coronary stenoses is regarded as an important antianginal mechanism [12, 13]; stenosis dilation has already been documented in several studies with nifedipine [14,15]. The present study investigates the influence of intravenous administration of two different doses of nisoldipine on angiographically normal and stenotic epicardial coronary arteries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%