1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02656467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the anodic dissolution behavior of butte and transvaal chalcocite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anodic dissolution mechanism of Cu 2 S is not as simple as shown by the authors mentioned above, because the reaction is more complex. Vitorge and Lamache 10 , who dissolved CuS 2 anodically, found Cu 1.92 S, Cu 1.77 S, Cu 1.60 S and Cu 1.31 S. Srinivasan et al 11 showed that the electrochemical behavior and the products of the dissolution will depend not only on the conditions of the process, but also on the origin of the copper sulfide. However, it can be accepted that this takes place in two successive steps, with the tension in the cells increasing to 0.6 V in the first step and to 1.6 V in the second:…”
Section: Introduction Anodic Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The anodic dissolution mechanism of Cu 2 S is not as simple as shown by the authors mentioned above, because the reaction is more complex. Vitorge and Lamache 10 , who dissolved CuS 2 anodically, found Cu 1.92 S, Cu 1.77 S, Cu 1.60 S and Cu 1.31 S. Srinivasan et al 11 showed that the electrochemical behavior and the products of the dissolution will depend not only on the conditions of the process, but also on the origin of the copper sulfide. However, it can be accepted that this takes place in two successive steps, with the tension in the cells increasing to 0.6 V in the first step and to 1.6 V in the second:…”
Section: Introduction Anodic Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%