“…Polymeric nanoparticles have been proposed as one promising modality for brain drug delivery due to their advantages, including enhanced solubility of drug payload, reduced drug metabolism, biodegradability, enhanced therapeutic efficacy, and reduced toxicity relative to the administration of free drugs. , Additionally, polymeric nanoparticles can be easily engineered by tuning their physicochemical properties based on the targeted application with enhanced delivery to brain. − Nevertheless, these studies are still far from optimal as the accumulation in the liver reduces the overall availability of the drug in the CNS. , One of the common ways to enhance drug delivery across the BBB is to adorn the surface of these bespoke nanomaterials with targeting ligands that can be recognized by the receptors expressed on the BBB and internalized via the process of endocytosis. ,− In addition to the nanoparticle size, shape, surface charge, − ligand type, conjugation strategy, orientation, and ligand density have recently emerged as critical parameters that significantly dictate the mechanism and kinetics of its cellular interaction. , In a recent review article, it was demonstrated that when the ligand density increases, the cellular association increases to a limit, after which a constant or decreased association is observed . Interestingly, targeted nanoparticles often qualitatively report the ligand density as ‘low’, ‘intermediate’, and ‘high’, or as a percentage and only a few reports quantitatively determine the number of ligands per nanoparticles.…”