Comparison of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogenosulfate and clopidogrel besylate in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Abstract

It is well known that patients with poor response to antiplatelet therapy are most likely to have more thrombotic events. Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS) is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetylsalicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate (CB), was recently approved as a generic drug for the same purpose while data about its antiplatelet effect are very scarce. Our study compared the antiplatelet effect of CHS and CB in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Patients with stable coronary artery disease (n = 101) (coronary lesions defined angiographically 30-70 %) were randomized to either CHS (n = 50) or CB (n = 51). After randomization a 600 mg loading dose of the drug was given and monitoring of antiplatelet effect was done 12-14 h later with VerifyNow assay. Antiplatelet response was measured with P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and % inhibition P2Y12 from baseline (% inhibition P2Y12). Moreover CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3 and CYP3Α5 polymorphisms were studied in all patients. Clinical characteristics were similar between the two study groups. No significant difference was observed for baseline platelet reactivity between CHS and CB patients (258 ± 38 vs. 256 ± 38 respectively, p = 0.79). No difference was found for antiplatelet response between the CHS and the CB group, assessed by PRU (195 ± 74 vs. 204 ± 67 respectively, p = 0.51) and by % inhibition P2Y12 (24 ± 25 vs. 24 ± 22 % respectively, p = 0.95). Number of heterozygotes for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was comparable and their platelet reactivity was similar between the two study groups. Our results indicate that both CB and CHS had an identical antiplatelet effect in patients with stable coronary artery disease. No difference on platelet reactivity of heterozygotes for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was found between the two study groups.

Salts of Clopidogrel: Investigation to Ensure Clinical Equivalence: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial

“…30 Consistent with the above-mentioned data are the results of other pharmacodynamic and clinical studies comparing CB formulations with the innovator CHS salt. 14,31 Overall, CB is a pharmacodynamically and clinically effective generic clopidogrel salt that can be safely used for the prevention and treatment of atherothrombotic diseases. In this regard, it should however be stated that some studies have raised important concerns on the clinical and pharmacodynamic effectiveness of generic clopidogrel salt formulations, other than CB.…”