2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
274
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 757 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
274
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The season item of seawall settlement time series is nonstationary and not oscillated at a fixed value [16]. Although it is not a random sequence, some relevant information of the nonstationary time series can still be extracted, but the prediction accuracy by the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model is low in this case.…”
Section: Fitting the Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The season item of seawall settlement time series is nonstationary and not oscillated at a fixed value [16]. Although it is not a random sequence, some relevant information of the nonstationary time series can still be extracted, but the prediction accuracy by the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model is low in this case.…”
Section: Fitting the Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ARIMA model orders and are initially identified based on the truncation and tailing of both the autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation coefficients of the stationary sequence. Then the values of and are determined by means of the order criterion [16], and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used in this study.…”
Section: Fitting the Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Than, the prediction were repeated five times for each sub-trace. The To determine the order of the models, we use Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), presented, among others, in [59] in section 8.6, and defined as…”
Section: Traffic Prediction With Arima and Farima Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infragravity-wave heights and periods were estimated from low-pass ltered data using formula (3) and (4). Data were proceed by Matlab soft [32][33][34].…”
Section: Wave Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%