1998
DOI: 10.1007/s004490050423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Baker's yeast process performance in laboratory and production scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, leavening ability in high sugar dough was measured in control and test final products, but there was no considerable difference between them. This finding was not in agreement with the previous work (George et al. 1998).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, leavening ability in high sugar dough was measured in control and test final products, but there was no considerable difference between them. This finding was not in agreement with the previous work (George et al. 1998).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As the loop time was short (about 8 s) and the specific growth rate was low during the last 7 h and oxygen bubbles were likely to be transferred to the loop via the pump, no oxygen limitation was observed. Therefore, the ethanol was not produced anaerobically in the two states of control and test fermentation (George et al. 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microorganisms used in large-scale reactor environments are continuously exposed to various types of gradients [96,98]. This comprises also the development of osmotic gradients as a result of the feeding of high concentrated nutrient solutions and insufficient mixing of the culture broth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixing times of large-scale bioreactors for microbial cultures exceed 100 s to reach 95% homogeneity, and the circulation time of the cells, which is proportional to the mixing time, is consequently in the magnitude of 10 s and longer depending on the stirring conditions (Delvigne, Destain, & Thonart, 2006;Nagata, 1975). Biomass and product yield reduction are reported for several different strains and processes when a process is scaled up to large scale (Bylund et al, 1998;Enfors et al, 2001;George, Larsson, Olsson, & Enfors, 1998;Xu, Jahic, Blomsten, & Enfors, 1999). Biomass and product yield reduction are reported for several different strains and processes when a process is scaled up to large scale (Bylund et al, 1998;Enfors et al, 2001;George, Larsson, Olsson, & Enfors, 1998;Xu, Jahic, Blomsten, & Enfors, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%