2019
DOI: 10.1177/0269881119826610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the behavioral effects of mescaline analogs using the head twitch response in mice

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(114 reference statements)
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moderate selectivity for the 5-HT 2A receptor over 5-HT 1A and 5-HT 2C receptors observed for the 4-alkyloxy substituted derivatives (structures 6 – 8, 12 – 14, 18 – 19 ) is in agreement with previously reported selectivity ratios for various substituted phenethylamines (Barfknecht and Nichols, 1975; Glennon et al, 1983; Pierce and Peroutka, 1989; Glennon et al, 1994; Nichols et al, 1994; Nelson et al, 1999; Rickli et al, 2015; Luethi et al, 2018). However, this selectivity for the 5-HT 2A receptor is not seen for tryptamine psychedelics or LSD, which are non-selective at these serotonergic receptors (Halberstadt and Geyer, 2011; Rickli et al, 2015; Luethi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moderate selectivity for the 5-HT 2A receptor over 5-HT 1A and 5-HT 2C receptors observed for the 4-alkyloxy substituted derivatives (structures 6 – 8, 12 – 14, 18 – 19 ) is in agreement with previously reported selectivity ratios for various substituted phenethylamines (Barfknecht and Nichols, 1975; Glennon et al, 1983; Pierce and Peroutka, 1989; Glennon et al, 1994; Nichols et al, 1994; Nelson et al, 1999; Rickli et al, 2015; Luethi et al, 2018). However, this selectivity for the 5-HT 2A receptor is not seen for tryptamine psychedelics or LSD, which are non-selective at these serotonergic receptors (Halberstadt and Geyer, 2011; Rickli et al, 2015; Luethi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, significant effects of this modification on the dosage and duration of action in vivo have been observed in humans (Shulgin and Shulgin, 1991). These are thought to be partially caused by an increased metabolic stability (Glennon et al, 1983; Glennon et al, 1992) and increased hydrophobicity (Nichols et al, 1991). Furthermore, intrinsic activity at the receptor also appear to play a significant role (Nichols et al, 1994), as the α-Me group-containing amphetamines show higher intrinsic activity compared to their phenethylamine counterparts (Parrish et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1P‐LSD also showed reduced potency compared to LSD when evaluated in HTR experiments . Generally, the potency relationships for hallucinogens in the mouse HTR paradigm closely parallel the human hallucinogenic data . Interpretation of the HTR potency data, however, is complicated by the possibility that 1B‐LSD serves as a pro‐drug for LSD, as indicated by in vitro assays .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If 1B‐LSD is not the active species and must be hydrolyzed to LSD then extrapolation of mouse potency data to humans is complicated by the possibility of species differences in metabolic enzymes. Nevertheless, although 1B‐LSD is not as potent as LSD in mice, it still has relatively high potency compared to many other hallucinogens …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation