2001
DOI: 10.1263/jbb.91.428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Biological NH3 Removal Characteristics among Four Inorganic Packing Materials.

Abstract: Four inorganic packing materials were evaluated in terms of their availability as a packing material of a packed tower deodorization apparatus (biofilter) from the viewpoints of biological NH3 removal characteristics and some physical properties. Porous ceramics (A), calcinated cristobalite (B), calcinated and formed obsidian (C), granulated and calculated soil (D) were used. The superiority of these packing materials determined based on the values of non-biological removal per unit weight or unit volume of pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the growth of mixed culture, the chemical composition of NH 4 Cl, MgCl 2 .6H 2 O, KH 2 PO 4 , K 2 HPO 4 , NaNO 3 , yeast extract and Na 2 S 2 O 3 .5H 2 O were 0.6, 0.2, 1.2, 1.2, 0.3, 1 and 7 g/L, respectively. Also, 2 mL of vitamin solution and 1 mL of trace metals were added to the prepared synthetic medium [12]. All the chemicals used were analytical graded and supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).…”
Section: Bacteria and Medium Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the growth of mixed culture, the chemical composition of NH 4 Cl, MgCl 2 .6H 2 O, KH 2 PO 4 , K 2 HPO 4 , NaNO 3 , yeast extract and Na 2 S 2 O 3 .5H 2 O were 0.6, 0.2, 1.2, 1.2, 0.3, 1 and 7 g/L, respectively. Also, 2 mL of vitamin solution and 1 mL of trace metals were added to the prepared synthetic medium [12]. All the chemicals used were analytical graded and supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).…”
Section: Bacteria and Medium Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wastewater treatment, the advantages of an appropriate inert carrier are as follows: insoluble, nonbiodegradable, non-toxic, non-polluting, light weight; flexible in overall shape, highly mechanically and chemically stable, highly diffuse, simple immobilization procedure, high biomass retention, and preferably a low cost [5]. In addition, inert carriers are also much easier to clean and replace [6,7]. Porous ceramic beads have been shown to be an appropriate packing material for wastewater treatment and other biotechnological applications, in particular, due to their high gas and liquid film mass transfer coefficients, high chemical and temperature resistance, mechanical strength, minimization of diffusion limitations of nutrients, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most frequently used inert packing materials include perlite, porous ceramics, activated carbon, porous lava, polyamide and polypropylene beads, and polyvinyl difluoride cubes has become prevalent [1,[9][10][11][12][13]. Although the cost of inert filter beads, in most cases, is higher compared to that of organic counterparts, the former have a range of advantages: chemical and physical inactivity, long lifetime, high performance, more regular shape, uniform air distribution, and reduced number of channeling issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%