2008
DOI: 10.5371/jkhs.2008.20.4.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Internal Fixation and Primary Hemiarthroplasty for Treating Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture in the Elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, postoperative early ambulation may not be feasible, and the rates of postoperative complications and mortality are high due to combined disorders. Accordingly, postoperative early ambulation and rehabilitation should be taken into account when considering treatment options, and hemiarthroplasty is regarded as one of the most effective primary treatment methods for unstable intertrochanteric fractures 3,4,17,18)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, postoperative early ambulation may not be feasible, and the rates of postoperative complications and mortality are high due to combined disorders. Accordingly, postoperative early ambulation and rehabilitation should be taken into account when considering treatment options, and hemiarthroplasty is regarded as one of the most effective primary treatment methods for unstable intertrochanteric fractures 3,4,17,18)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The achievement of initial press-fit fixation is essential for early ambulation and rehabilitation. In one study, hemiarthroplasty produced better postoperative results than internal fixation in terms of limping and the use of a walking aid in patients with limited walking ability before surgery 18). Considering that press-fit fixation in the proximal femur is difficult to achieve in elderly patients with unstable fractures, the use of a cylindrical implant that can be fixed to the isthmus or diaphysis can be helpful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cemented fixation is advantageous for enhancing the initial fixation strength in aged patients with poor bone quality [11], whereas cementless fixation facilitates biological fixation and can avoid cardiovascular toxicity [12]. Some studies have reported positive outcomes in arthroplasty using cementless implants in elderly patients with an improvement of the implant design, material and insertion technique [8,13].…”
Section: Groupsmentioning
confidence: 98%