1975
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/32.11.1153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Clinical Utility of Four Drug Information Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 6–24 The majority of the methodological evaluations (11/19) included more than one search for adverse effect data (Table 2). 6,8–10,13,16,19,21–24 Ninety‐four separate searches were conducted for information on adverse effects, however, four methodological evaluations (representing 36 searches) did not present the results of each search separately 8–10,24 . To be able to compare the results of all 19 methodological evaluations, the combined results of the searches within each methodological evaluation were used wherever possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 6–24 The majority of the methodological evaluations (11/19) included more than one search for adverse effect data (Table 2). 6,8–10,13,16,19,21–24 Ninety‐four separate searches were conducted for information on adverse effects, however, four methodological evaluations (representing 36 searches) did not present the results of each search separately 8–10,24 . To be able to compare the results of all 19 methodological evaluations, the combined results of the searches within each methodological evaluation were used wherever possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two instances, combining the results within a methodological evaluation was deemed inappropriate. One methodological evaluation contained searches for two different types of interventions 23 and another included searches of different data sources 21 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 [7][8][9] Several comparisons of the utility of these resources in answering drug information questions have been published. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Likewise, a research group has evaluated the utility of electronic drug information resources for answering questions received in decentralized pharmacies. 8 However, to my knowledge, no published studies have addressed the ability of references and databases to answer herbal-related questions received in clinical settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of IDIS, de Haen Drugs in Use, de Haen Drugs in Research and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts undertaken by Tourville & McLeod (1975) indicated that of the services under study, IDIS was the most suitable for hospital pharmacy drug information units. Ringdoc provides a specialized service t o pharmacy but it is beyond the financial means of any but the larger industrial firms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ringdoc provides a specialized service t o pharmacy but it is beyond the financial means of any but the larger industrial firms. The comparison of IDIS, de Haen Drugs in Use, de Haen Drugs in Research and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts undertaken by Tourville & McLeod (1975) indicated that of the services under study, IDIS was the most suitable for hospital pharmacy drug information units.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%