Comparison of the Cobas-Bact five-hour susceptibility testing system with the NCCLS agar diffusion and dilution methods

Abstract

The results of susceptibility tests performed by the Cobas-Bact system were compared with those of the NCCLS agar diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) and NCCLS agar dilution methods. A total of 998 clinical isolates were tested against 10 to 18 antimicrobial agents. Essential agreement (comprising full agreement and minor discrepancies) varied from 90.5% to 99.2% on comparison of Cobas-Bact with Kirby-Bauer results, depending on the bacterial group (mean for all 998 strains tested 95.7%). These figures ranged from 91% to 99.2% (mean 96.3%) for the Cobas-Bact/MIC comparison and from 95.2% to 99.7% (mean 98.7%) for the Kirby-Bauer/MIC comparison. The best results were found for Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus, whereas for enterococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci there was a lower rate of essential agreement in all three comparisons. In the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa there was a good rate of essential agreement but many minor discrepancies, resulting in a disappointing rate of full agreement of between 67.5% and 78.9% in the three comparisons. The Cobas-Bact system would appear to provide satisfactory susceptibility test results in most cases, however there are still some major problems in the system which should be resolved.

Circumventing antibiotic resistance in specialized hospital units

“…The analysis should show not only the susceptibilities of first isolates from individual patients but also those of subsequent isolates, to determine whether resistance may develop during treatment. A further point is the need for rapid microbiological results; for several years it has been possible in many cases to obtain full results within 24 h [2]. There are even some data showing that rapid microbiological results may improve survival of patients [3].…”