2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29053-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the combined use of CNV-seq and karyotyping or QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis: a retrospective study

Abstract: To elevate the accuracy of diagnostic results, CNV-seq is usually performed simultaneously with karyotyping or QF-PCR. Although several studies have investigated the performance of the combined use of CNV-seq with karyotyping or QF-PCR, there have been no reports focusing on the comparison of these 2 diagnostic strategies. In our study, 2507 pregnant women were included to investigate these 2 strategies. The detection rates of foetal genetic abnormalities and turnaround time were compared between these 2 group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, with the development of treatment technology, other types of chromosomal disorders, such as other chromosome abnormalities and chromosome copy number variants (CNVs), are also attracting increasing attention. 3 Prenatal screening is a vital tool to detect fetal chromosomal disorders and reduce the birth of fetuses with birth defects. Traditional screening and detection of fetal aneuploidy depends on biochemical detection and ultrasonic detection, and the detection rate is 50-95%, 4 which is unstable and unsatisfactory, leading to many meaningless invasive tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with the development of treatment technology, other types of chromosomal disorders, such as other chromosome abnormalities and chromosome copy number variants (CNVs), are also attracting increasing attention. 3 Prenatal screening is a vital tool to detect fetal chromosomal disorders and reduce the birth of fetuses with birth defects. Traditional screening and detection of fetal aneuploidy depends on biochemical detection and ultrasonic detection, and the detection rate is 50-95%, 4 which is unstable and unsatisfactory, leading to many meaningless invasive tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%