2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the condition of steel fiber-reinforced shotcrete with water-glass and alkali-free activators after more than 20 years of service in a subsea road tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corrosion of the steel fibres was only observed in the carbonation zone at the intrados of the linings. Given the uncertainties about concrete composition and variations over the 6.8 km long tunnel, the study indicates no clear negative long-term durability of concerns of sprayed concrete with alkali free accelerators compared to water glass accelerators [25].…”
Section: Effect On Durabilitymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corrosion of the steel fibres was only observed in the carbonation zone at the intrados of the linings. Given the uncertainties about concrete composition and variations over the 6.8 km long tunnel, the study indicates no clear negative long-term durability of concerns of sprayed concrete with alkali free accelerators compared to water glass accelerators [25].…”
Section: Effect On Durabilitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recently research by Manquehual et al [25] on the effect of both old-fashioned water glass and modern alkali-free accelerators provide information about performance of alkali free accelerators in sprayed concrete with the (to our knowledge) longest service life so far -greater than 20 years at the time of writing. The tunnel linings studied in their paper were the first use of sprayed concrete linings with aluminium sulphate based set accelerators in Norwegian road tunnels [25].…”
Section: Effect On Durabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion was that composite fiber shotcrete and basalt fiber shotcrete had better flatness and compactness than plain concrete, and basalt fiber shotcrete was more economical than composite fiber shotcrete. However, compare with the application of steel fiber reinforced concrete and polypropylene fiber concrete (Hagelia, 2011;Bhasin and Aarset, 2020;Jiang et al, 2020;Alencar Monteiro and Andrade Silva, 2021;Manquehual et al, 2022), the application of basalt fiber reinforced concrete was limited. Basalt fiber is a kind of new inorganic fiber material with good physical and mechanical properties, and it has the characteristics of high cost performance and easy access to materials.…”
Section: Fiber Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%