1976
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1976.1162839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the cosine and Fourier transforms of Markov-1 signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TSP.2015.2447494 [2] is asymptotically equivalent to the KLT for the whole class of stationary processes [3], including the AR(1) model [4]; thus, for a Gaussian input, all these transforms result in a fully decoupled (independent) representation. However, this favorable independence-related property is extinguished for non-Gaussian processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TSP.2015.2447494 [2] is asymptotically equivalent to the KLT for the whole class of stationary processes [3], including the AR(1) model [4]; thus, for a Gaussian input, all these transforms result in a fully decoupled (independent) representation. However, this favorable independence-related property is extinguished for non-Gaussian processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to data-dependency, the PCA is not suitable for all saliency detection tasks when it is obtained from finite image samples. As has been mentioned, there exists an asymptotic equivalence between DCT and the PCA for Markov-1 signals (Hamidi and Pearl 1976;Rao and Yip 1990). This means that the PCA for digital images approaches the DCT as the number of training samples tends to infinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ahmed et al (1974) proposed a discrete cosine transform (DCT) and compared its performance with the Karhunen-Loeve transform (also known as PCA) in image processing applications. After that, a number of studies (e.g., Shanmugam 1975;Hamidi and Pearl 1976;Clarke 1981; Uenohara and Kanade 1998) have mathematically proved the asymptotic equivalence between the DCT and the PCA for Markov-1 processes, which is commonly used to approximate image data. This means that PCA for Markov-1 signals approaches the DCT as the number of training samples tends to infinity.…”
Section: Extending To Pulsed Cosine Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the projection subspace is suboptimal, though very close to the PCA subspace when the source is a Markov process of 1st order [35]. In this case, the feature vector is: …”
Section: Dct Space Euclidean Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%