2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2019.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Coulomb and non-orthogonal approaches to the construction of the exciton Hamiltonian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the increasing computer power and the fact that NOCI is very well suited for parallelization 32 has caused a revival of the computational schemes in which the orthogonality restrictions have been removed. 33–48…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increasing computer power and the fact that NOCI is very well suited for parallelization 32 has caused a revival of the computational schemes in which the orthogonality restrictions have been removed. 33–48…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a close distance the overlap and exchange contributions might be significant. 12 These contributions can be calculated using the transition density fragment interaction method (TDFI 13 ). In this case, a significant contribution of charge transfer (CT) to the excited states can also take place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a significant contribution of charge transfer (CT) to the excited states can also take place. 12,14 To take this factor into account, the CT states are to be added in the excitonic Hamiltonian basis. Such extended Hamiltonian can be used not only for the excited states properties and dynamics description, but also for the electron transfer modeling in bacterial and plant photosynthetic reaction centers, for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an approach is quite reliable in the weak-coupling limit 17 and can be extended to account for intermolecular charge transfer states. [18][19][20][21] To accurately account for short-range effects, fragment density approaches (FDAs) were developed, 13,22,23 in which the analysis of the Hamiltonian is performed in the eigenstate basis for the initial and final EET states of interest. In particular, the fragment excitation difference (FED) approach, 13 which is a generalization of the energy splitting in dimer (ESD) method 24 for nonsymmetric systems, provides reasonably accurate values of EET at all physically meaningful intermolecular distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%