2022
DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.27880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with and Without Attenuation Correction

Abstract: Objectives: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is an important diagnostic test for detecting of coronary artery stenosis (CAS); however, tissue attenuation can lead to a difference in accuracy. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected (AC) and non-attenuation-corrected (NC) MPS for the detection of CAS. Methods: We retrospectively recruited patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography within 10 months after Tc-99m sestamibi MPS. The AC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several limitations of this study were noticeable. First, it should be reminded that perfusion defect on perfusion images is still the most crucial findings for diagnosis of CAD from the MPI [16]. Although up to 7.2% of patients with normal perfusion images had CAD [12], correctable causes of false negative perfusion images must be excluded before the perfusion be considered normal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several limitations of this study were noticeable. First, it should be reminded that perfusion defect on perfusion images is still the most crucial findings for diagnosis of CAD from the MPI [16]. Although up to 7.2% of patients with normal perfusion images had CAD [12], correctable causes of false negative perfusion images must be excluded before the perfusion be considered normal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coronary angiography scoring system used a scale of zero to three, with zero indicating normal studies, one indicating one-vessel disease, two indicating two-vessel disease, and three indicating three-vessel disease. The imaging times for both scanners ranged from 4 to 6 min [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%