2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(00)00223-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the diagnostic value of cardiac troponin I and T determinations for detecting early myocardial damage and the relationship with histological findings after isoprenaline-induced cardiac injury in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

11
81
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
11
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This finding is consistent with previous results on the early myocardial damage induced by isoproterenol [1,9]. There were no differences in the degree of the change among the dose levels, unlike the results on the clinicopathological parameters described below.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1). This finding is consistent with previous results on the early myocardial damage induced by isoproterenol [1,9]. There were no differences in the degree of the change among the dose levels, unlike the results on the clinicopathological parameters described below.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, different parameters are sometimes employed in toxicity studies, so knowledge regarding such correlation would be valuable information for evaluating the toxicity across toxicity studies (i.e., bridging data between toxicity studies). We have therefore investigated the correlation among clinicopathological parameters of myocardial damage in rats treated with isoproterenol, which is a typical compound for inducing myocardial damage [1,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The medians of the troponin I concentrations increased above the cut-off level 2 hours after substance administration. This time interval was also observed in isoproterenol-induced cardiac injury in rats (Bertinchant, 2000). This was a considerably earlier increase as after an acute myocardial infarction in humans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%