Comparison of the effect of sodium hypochlorite, EDTA, and etidronic acid on wettability of root canal sealers using contact angle goniometer: An in vitro study

Tammineedi, Sravanthi; Sudha, Kakollu; Thota, Murali Mohan; Basam, Lakshman Chowdary; Basam, Ram Chowdary; Chinthamreddy, Shoba

doi:10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_78_20

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The contact angle is inversely proportional to wettability. 13 The goal of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the contact angle and dentinal tubule penetration depth of a bioceramic sealer (Well-Root ST; Vericom, Gangwon-Do, Korea) compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer (Expoxidin Duo; Tehno-Dent, Belgorod, Russia) as well as their impact on the bond strength of fiber post cemented by a selfadhesive resin cement. The null hypothesis was that the bioceramic sealer would show a lower contact angle and higher dentinal tubule penetration leading to the higher bond strength of cemented fiber post.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Sabry,

Beleidy,

Shaker

2023

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate Well-Root ST and Expoxidin Duo sealers' contact angle, dentinal tubule penetration, and their impact on fiber post-bond strength. Materials and Methods:Fifty-eight maxillary central incisor teeth were collected and decoronated. Ten teeth were longitudinally split into 20 segments and treated with bioceramic (Well-Root ST) and epoxy resin-based (Epoxidin Duo) sealers (n=10 per group) to evaluate the contact angle. Forty-eight teeth were divided into two groups (n=24) based on the same sealers used for obturation. Both obturated teeth groups were subdivided into two subgroups based on the evaluating test; 14 specimens were assessed for dentinal tubule penetration using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and 10 specimens were restored with fiber posts and cross-sectioned to evaluate the push-out bond strength using a universal testing machine. Failure mode was determined for pushed-out slices under a SEM. Independent t-test was used to compare two different groups. One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was the significance level.Results: Epoxidin Duo group showed a significantly higher contact angle (56.78 ± 0.68 o ) than Well-Root ST group (53.25 ± 0.25 o ). Well-Root ST group showed significantly higher dentinal tubule penetration (10.40 ± 1.05 µm) than Epoxidin Duo group (7.61 ± 1.08 µm). Both groups showed a non-significant push-out bond strength difference. Conclusions: Bioceramic sealer showed higher wettability and dentinal tubule penetration than epoxy resin-based sealer. However, both sealers affected the fiber post-bond strength at various regions throughout the root canal length without influencing the total bond strength.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Sabry,

Beleidy,

Shaker

2023

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Contact angle expresses the spread of a liquid on a solid surface, their measurements give a better knowledge on solids and liquids interactions. Contact angle is inversely proportional with wettability 21,22 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of dentinal tubules penetration of bio-ceramic and resin root canal sealers using different obturation techniques: An in-vitro study

Omaia

Sabry

shaker

2023

Advanced Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate contact angle and dentinal tubules penetration depth of Epoxy resin-based sealer Adseal and calcium silicate-based sealer CeraSeal with different obturation techniques using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).Subjects and methods: 56 freshly extracted upper central incisors were prepared in the present study. The specimens were divided into four experimental groups (each n= 14) which were filled with different sealers (Ceraseal and Adseal) by different obturation techniques {Cold lateral compaction (CLC) and Warm vertical compaction (WVC)} and respective core filling materials. Group 1 (Ceraseal/ WVC), Group 2 (Ceraseal/CLC), Group 3 (Adseal/ WVC) and Group 4 (Adseal/ CLC). Root slices were cut with a thickness of 1 mm at 2 to 3, 5 to 6 and 8 to 9 mm from the root tip using diamond saw with coolant then scanning electron microscope at 1600x magnification was employed to assess the tubular penetration of different sealers. One Way ANOVA test was used to compare different groups, followed by Tukey`s Post Hoc test for multiple sections comparison. The significance level (P-value) was set as P-value < 0.05.Results: CeraSeal /CLC group and Adseal / WVC group showed the highest dentinal tubules penetration (11.75±3.72 µm and 10.45±4.73 µm, respectively) with statistically insignificant difference between them (P>0.05). Adseal/CLC group showed the lowest penetration (6.63±2.73 µm), while CeraSeal/ WVC group (9.41±2.71 µm) revealed insignificant difference with the other groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Obturation technique should be selected according to sealer type for a successful endodontic treatment. Bioceramic sealer had higher ability of dentinal tubules penetration than epoxy resin sealer.

show abstract

Comparative evaluation of wettability of AH plus, Ceraseal and Guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers on root canal dentin: An in vitro study

Kunam,

Uppalapati,

Ponnapalli

et al. 2024

Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Effective root canal treatment relies on the ability of sealers to wet and penetrate the root canal system, ensuring a tight seal and preventing bacterial leakage. The current study investigates the wetting ability of newer root canal sealers by evaluating their contact angle. Aim: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the wetting behavior of Guttaflow bioseal, Ceraseal, and AH plus root canal sealers. Materials and Methods: Decoronation and apical third resections of thirty extracted singlerooted human mandibular premolars were done. The roots were then split longitudinally into two halves buccolingually. The root dentin surfaces were treated using 10 mL 3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, 10 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 5 min, and 2% chlorhexidine for 10 min. Then, these sixty dentin bars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20): Group 1 – AH Plus, Group 2 – Ceraseal, and Group 3 – Guttaflow bioseal. The controlled volume of 0.1 mL sealer has been dispensed onto the dentin specimen using a micropipette. The contact angle of a drop of sealer was measured after 5 min using Ossila goniometer. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests. The statistical significance was at P < 0.05. Results: The mean contact angle values for AH Plus sealer were lower when compared to the other two sealer groups which is statistically highly significant. Conclusions: AH Plus showed lesser contact angle thereby better wettability than Ceraseal and Guttaflow bioseal on the root canal dentin surface.

show abstract

Comparison of the effect of sodium hypochlorite, EDTA, and etidronic acid on wettability of root canal sealers using contact angle goniometer: An in vitro study

Cited by 5 publications

References 10 publications

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Evaluation of dentinal tubules penetration of bio-ceramic and resin root canal sealers using different obturation techniques: An in-vitro study

Comparative evaluation of wettability of AH plus, Ceraseal and Guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers on root canal dentin: An in vitro study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About