2021
DOI: 10.52547/jccs.2.3.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Effect of Face-to-face Training and Educational Booklet on Adherence to Regimen Therapy in Diabetic Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: The prevention and control the type-2 diabetes ... [10] Medication adherence in type 2 diabetes ... [11] Low reported adherence to the 2019 American ... [12] Adherence to dietary recommendations in diabetes ... [13] Evaluation of the effects of educating about ... [14] Patients' perspectives of care for type 2 diabetes ... [15] The effect of self-care program education ... [16] Comparison of the effect of face to face teaching ...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the post hoc test showed no significant difference between the telenursing and face-to-face groups (p = 0.244). In line with previous research on the comparison of the effects of face-to-face training and educational booklets, there was no significant difference between the two interventions (Taheri, Alamdari & Afrasiabi, 2021). The conclusion is that educational methods in telenursing and face-to-face training are effective and improve the quality of life for burn patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the post hoc test showed no significant difference between the telenursing and face-to-face groups (p = 0.244). In line with previous research on the comparison of the effects of face-to-face training and educational booklets, there was no significant difference between the two interventions (Taheri, Alamdari & Afrasiabi, 2021). The conclusion is that educational methods in telenursing and face-to-face training are effective and improve the quality of life for burn patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%