2008
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00155.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the effects of inorganic phosphate on caffeine-induced Ca2+ release in fast- and slow-twitch mammalian skeletal muscle

Abstract: We compared the effects of 50 mM P(i) on caffeine-induced Ca(2+) release in mechanically skinned fast-twitch (FT) and slow-twitch (ST) skeletal muscle fibers of the rat. The time integral (area) of the caffeine response was reduced by approximately 57% (FT) and approximately 27% (ST) after 30 s of exposure to 50 mM P(i) in either the presence or absence of creatine phosphate (to buffer ADP). Differences in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) content between FT and ST fibers [ approximately 40% vs. 100% SR C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because mM concentrations of caffeine stimulate Ca 2 + release from the SR Ca 2 + release channel (RyR1), and thereby by-pass upstream components of excitation-contraction coupling, force production during caffeine contracture testing can be inferred as an index of contractile protein content and, when compared to voltage-induced force production, as an index of excitation contraction coupling failure. [32][33][34][35][36]39,[47][48][49][50] The caffeine contracture forces observed in this study (Fig. 3F) are consistent with the supposition that repair of VML injury with the TE-MR construct, is due, at least in part, to the presence of more contractile machinery; when compared to no repair or scaffold-only repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Because mM concentrations of caffeine stimulate Ca 2 + release from the SR Ca 2 + release channel (RyR1), and thereby by-pass upstream components of excitation-contraction coupling, force production during caffeine contracture testing can be inferred as an index of contractile protein content and, when compared to voltage-induced force production, as an index of excitation contraction coupling failure. [32][33][34][35][36]39,[47][48][49][50] The caffeine contracture forces observed in this study (Fig. 3F) are consistent with the supposition that repair of VML injury with the TE-MR construct, is due, at least in part, to the presence of more contractile machinery; when compared to no repair or scaffold-only repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus our data, which show that neither H 2 O 2 (nor subsequent glutathionylation with GSH) nor GSNO alters the Ca 2ϩ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus of slow-twitch fibers, may represent one mechanism for fatigue resistance. The relative insensitivity of slow-twitch fibers to these effects is similar to recent data that show that slow-twitch fibers are largely insensitive to a number of compounds thought to be involved in fatigue (16,24,30). However, again it is possible that under extreme conditions, slow-twitch muscle may still succumb to elevated levels of ROS, where more potent molecular species may be generated (such as hydroxyl radical, OH ⅐ ; 20), particularly at elevated temperatures (such as superoxide; 8).…”
Section: Effects Of Gsno and H 2 O 2 On Slow-twitch Skeletal Muscle Asupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Fast-twitch fibers also fatigue rapidly with repeated activity whilst slow-twitch fibers appear largely fatigue resistant. We and others have recently shown that, unlike fast-twitch fibers, the fatigue resistance of slow-twitch fibers appears to arise in part due to a lack of sensitivity to various metabolites involved in fatigue in fasttwitch fibers (such as inorganic phosphate and ADP; 16,24). To date, there has been no systematic comparison of the effects of both ROS and NO on the Ca 2ϩ sensitivity of both fiber types, with nothing known about the effects of NO on slowtwitch fiber Ca 2ϩ sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their experiments a 2 min exposure to 30 mM P i was sufficient to reduce Ca 2+ release to a steady level suggesting that this mechanism would have time to operate during a fatigue protocol of this or greater length. This mechanism appears to be substantially smaller in slow fibers compared to fast, which may contribute to the fatigue-resistance of slow fibers (Posterino and Dunn, 2008). …”
Section: The Effect Of Pi On Ca2+ Releasementioning
confidence: 99%