2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the effects of ozone, biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration and combined ozone-BAC pre-treatments on the microfiltration of secondary effluent

Abstract: Comparison of the effects of ozone, biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration and combined ozone-BAC pre-treatments on the microfiltration of secondary effluent, Separation and Purification Technology (2019), doi:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, understanding the removal mechanisms of CECs via ozone‐BAF and its linkage to the design and operational variables are still evolving. Bulk organic parameters such as TOC or dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and ultraviolet absorbance (UVA) are oftentimes used as surrogate indicators to predict the fate and transport of trace organic compounds in ozone‐BAF systems (Arnold et al, 2018; Dickenson, Drewes, Sedlak, Wert, & Snyder, 2009; Gifford et al, 2018; Ibn Abdul Hamid, Sanciolo, Gray, Duke, & Muthukumaran, 2019; Im, Nakada, Fukuma, & Tanaka, 2019; G. Li, Ben, Ye, Zhang, & Qiang, 2018; Sundaram et al, 2020; Tackaert et al, 2019; Trussell et al, 2016). However, the complex matrices found in wastewaters with different degrees of susceptibility to oxidation and adsorption/biodegradation make it difficult for TOC or UVA alone to provide predictions of CEC removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, understanding the removal mechanisms of CECs via ozone‐BAF and its linkage to the design and operational variables are still evolving. Bulk organic parameters such as TOC or dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and ultraviolet absorbance (UVA) are oftentimes used as surrogate indicators to predict the fate and transport of trace organic compounds in ozone‐BAF systems (Arnold et al, 2018; Dickenson, Drewes, Sedlak, Wert, & Snyder, 2009; Gifford et al, 2018; Ibn Abdul Hamid, Sanciolo, Gray, Duke, & Muthukumaran, 2019; Im, Nakada, Fukuma, & Tanaka, 2019; G. Li, Ben, Ye, Zhang, & Qiang, 2018; Sundaram et al, 2020; Tackaert et al, 2019; Trussell et al, 2016). However, the complex matrices found in wastewaters with different degrees of susceptibility to oxidation and adsorption/biodegradation make it difficult for TOC or UVA alone to provide predictions of CEC removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Available membrane filtration treatment for drinking water [ 34 , 61 , 68 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ]. …”
Section: Membrane Filtration Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of other upstream treatments such as coagulation, ozonation or chlorination on bacterial growth and density have to be considered, as these treatments can impact biofilm development. For example, residual chlorine in the influent water to a pilot-scale BAC unit reduced the bacterial attachment on its surface, while a pre-ozonation process before BAC treatment improved the biological activity of the biofilm for contaminant degradation in many cases 18,23,[106][107][108] . These aspects should be considered during design of BEB filters for industrial/ municipal applications.…”
Section: Challenges and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%