Comparison of the effects of 10.6-μm infrared laser and traditional moxibustion in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Abstract

Based on two separate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) moxibustion and 10.6-μm infrared laser moxibustion in treating knee osteoarthritis (OA), we did an indirect and preliminary comparison of the effects of the 10.6-μm laser moxibustion with the traditional moxibustion for knee osteoarthritis. The objective was to see whether the laser moxibustion is non-inferior to the traditional moxibustion in alleviating symptoms of knee osteoarthritis such as pain, stiffness, and joint dysfunction as well as improving quality of life for the patients with knee osteoarthritis, and whether a further RCT directly comparing the laser and traditional moxibustion is necessary. Pooled data from two RCTs in patients with knee osteoarthritis, trial ISRCTN68475405 and trial ISRCTN26065334, were used. In the two RCTs, the eligibility criteria were almost identical, the treatment procedure (i.e., sessions, duration, and points) were similar, and the outcome measurements (i.e., WOMAC for symptoms and SF-36 for quality of life) were the same. The double robustness method was used for the WOMAC scale and the SF-36 endpoints to detect the difference between traditional and laser moxibustion. The analysis comprised 55 patients from ISRCTN68475405 in real moxibustion arm (moxibustion group) and 88 patients from ISRCTN26065334 in real laser moxibustion arm (laser group). Demographic characteristics and course of disease were similar between the two groups. Causal inference, using the doubly robust estimating approach to correct for bias due to baseline differences, showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function between the two treatments at midterm, end of treatment, and 4 weeks after the end of treatment (P > 0.05). The exception was that there was statistically significantly more benefit associated with laser moxibustion compared with traditional moxibustion in physical function at the follow-up of 4 weeks after the end of treatment (P=0.006). There was no statistically significant Lin Lin and Ke Cheng contributed equally to this study, and should be considered as co-first authors.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a systematic review

“…The most serious type of acute lung injury is known to be acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS, as a clinical disease with high mortality rate, is mostly caused by an elevated rates of permeability in pulmonary vessels and pulmonary edema, which is often induced by coughing, sepsis and pneumonia (such as those caused by human influenza, bird flu, and SARS viruses) (Lin et al, 2020). As mentioned earlier, ACE, as an important enzyme in RAS, transforms angiotensin (Ang) I to the vasoconstrictor Ang II.…”

The Effectiveness of Laser Acupuncture for Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies

“…Finally, 20 articles were included, comprising 568 patients receiving LA and 534 patients receiving sham treatment. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] The process of study search, screening, and selection is shown in Figure 1, and the characteristics of included articles are described in Table 1. The risk of bias of each included study is depicted in Supplementary Figure 2.…”

“…The laser parameters used for LA in these studies were as follows: wavelength, 632.8–980 nm; power, 4–200 mW; and energy, 0.275–43.2 J. Four studies 43 , 45 , 46 , 52 revealed negative results for LA; two of these studies 43 , 45 applied 0.2 J of energy to acupoints, and one study 52 applied 61.2–68.8 J. A power density and energy that is too low or high can result in an ineffective response.…”

Pandemic lockdown, healthcare policies and human rights: integrating opposed views on COVID-19 public health mitigation measures

“…While solid arguments back-up the question, "Why did the lockdown strategy work well in China?'' (Lin et al, 2020), there are countries where accurate, efficient lockdown measures are, in reality, painful, and improbable to implement. Weighing the negative economic impact (with more than 30% of jobs being potentially at risk) (OECD., 2020) and pressed by an estimated world output fall by 23% at the peak of the crisis (when many countries are under a lockdown) (Mandel and Veetil, 2020), many governments did and does not have the strength to sustain China's severe measures.…”