Comparison of the Effects of Software Zeroing on Performance While Using Two Sighting Technologies in a Marksmanship Simulator

Abstract

This study was an equipment comparison and system process investigation. The primary goal was to determine if (1) the simulator system requires software zeroing prior to use for dynamic marksmanship events, and if (2) the M68 close combat optic (CCO) provides benefits for marksmanship performance over the iron sights when used in conjunction with the simulator system. Twenty-one male Soldiers participated in a two-phase marksmanship performance-testing event, using a weapon simulator and two sighting technologies. Accuracy, precision, and aiming time were used to measure performance. The results revealed that there is benefit to software zeroing only during a static single-target event with multiple shots over time. Zeroing provided no benefit across all measures during a more dynamic marksmanship event with limited shots required per target where speed took precedence over accuracy. Additionally, the CCO significantly improved accuracy and precision over the iron sights in both static and active events.