1991
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90313-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the effects of the irreversible aromatase inhibitor exemestane with atamestane and MDL 18962 in rats with DMBA-induced mammary tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while recognizing the limited utility of the hormone measurements in this study design in general, the uniformly low values for LH in treated rats were consistent with expectations of effects of exemestane (Zaccheo et al 1991). These lower values were supported by histologic findings including the absence of recent ovulation and atrophy of ovarian interstitial cells (Erickson et al 1985;Freeman 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, while recognizing the limited utility of the hormone measurements in this study design in general, the uniformly low values for LH in treated rats were consistent with expectations of effects of exemestane (Zaccheo et al 1991). These lower values were supported by histologic findings including the absence of recent ovulation and atrophy of ovarian interstitial cells (Erickson et al 1985;Freeman 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Unlike similar effects in this model with the steroidal AI exemestane, our previous study [30] showed these bone preserving effects are not blocked by the androgen receptor blocker flutamide [33] and thus appear to be non-androgenic [4,30,34,35]. The mechanism of bone preserving effects of ATA remains unexplained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…ATA significantly increased BMD, bone mechanical strength and trabecular bone volume in OVX rats. But these bone preserving effects are not blocked by the androgen receptor blocker flutamide (FLT) [38] and thus appear to be non-androgenic [2,39,40]. ATA had no stimulatory effect on the uterine epithelium in OVX rats indicating an absence of an intrinsic estrogenic signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%