Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine/Propofol and Sufentanil/Propofol on the Incidence of Intraoperative Hypoxemia during Bronchoscopy: Protocol for a Randomized, Prospective, Parallel-Group Trial

Huang, Xiao; Ai, Pan; Wei, Changwei; Sun, Yuan; Wu, Anshi

doi:10.3390/jcm11154587

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(33 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Propofol is often used in combination with ketamine and opioids to improve efficacy and patient tolerance. Several studies ( Wang et al, 2019 ; Eberl et al, 2020 ; Huang et al, 2022 ; Xu et al, 2022 ) have compared a single-dose combination of esketamine and propofol with propofol and other types of drugs in terms of side effects and degree of sedation undergoing minor procedures, withesketamine doses ranged from 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg. Esketamine (0.5 mg/kg) has been proven to be safe and well tolerated in Chinese patients undergoing painless gastroscopy, with no serious adverse events ( Wang et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The median effective concentration of propofol in combination with different doses of esketamine during gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We designed a four-arm randomized controlled trial to investigate the median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol in combination with different doses of esketamine inducing appropriate depth of anaesthesia during gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults. One hundred patients aged 18–65 years planning for gastrointestinal endoscopy were divided into four groups randomly: esketamine 0, 0.15, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg groups (n = 25). Propofol doses followed the Dixon and Massey up-and-down method with different starting between groups. The primary endpoint was the EC50 of propofol. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative dose of propofol, the duration of the procedure, recovery time, and adverse effects. The EC50 (median, 95% confidence interval) of propofol was significantly less in the esketamine 0.5 mg/kg group compared with the esketamine 0, 0.15, and 0.25 mg/kg groups [1.34 (1.15, 1.54) vs. 3.48 (3.25, 3.71), 2.82 (2.58, 3.07), and 2.36 (2.11, 2.61), respectively; p < 0.001]. The total dose of propofol (mean ± SD) required for the whole procedure was significantly less in the esketamine 0.5 mg/kg group compared with the esketamine 0, 0.15, and 0.25 mg/kg groups [95.5 ± 43.1 vs. 277.4 ± 49.0, 207.8 ± 31.6, and 135.1 ± 27.7, respectively; p < 0.001]. The recovery time was significantly longer in esketamine 0 and 0.5 mg/kg group compared with other two groups (p < 0.001). More patients in the esketamine 0.5 mg/kg group experienced visual disturbance compared with the other groups (p = 0.016). Additionally, the incidence of hypotensionin the esketamine 0 mg/kg group after inducation was higher compared with other groups (p < 0.001). In summary, the administration of esketamine significantly and dose-dependently reduced the dose of propofol required to accomplish procedures.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The median effective concentration of propofol in combination with different doses of esketamine during gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to the increased sympathetic tone, voluntary breathing and airway reflexes are maintained, and esketamine therefore stabilizes breathing. 25 Furthermore, propofol is related to a higher risk of respiratory inhibition in a dose-dependent manner. 26 Hence, the reduced dosage of propofol is another key factor for the lower incidence of hypoxemia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy and Safety of a Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Zheng¹,

Wang²,

Qian³

et al. 2023

DDDT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Patients with obesity are more susceptible to hypoxemia. Anesthetic management for patients with obesity undergoing painless gastroscopy presents a severe challenge for anesthesiologists. Esketamine is a NMDA antagonist that has been proven to be beneficial for ameliorating respiratory depression owing to its sympathomimetic effect; however, there are no relevant reports on its use in patients with obesity. We designed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether esketamine can be the ideal adjuvant to propofol sedation in patients with obesity undergoing painless gastroscopy. Patients and Methods A total of 104 patients with obesity undergoing painless gastroscopy were randomly divided into group C (propofol+saline) and group S (propofol+esketamine 0.25 mg/kg). Anesthesia was induced by 2 mg/kg propofol with saline or esketamine. The consumption of propofol, hemodynamic parameters, duration of procedure, induction time, postoperative awakening time, and orientation recovery time were recorded. Adverse events and satisfaction scores were also recorded. Results Propofol consumption was 274.4±22.6 mg and 201.3±16.6 mg in groups C and S, respectively. The induction time of groups C and S were 25.4±2.3 s and 17.8±1.9 s, respectively. The postoperative awakening times of groups C and S were 6.2±1.1 min and 4.8±1.3 min, respectively. Hemodynamic parameters were more stable in group S than in group C. The incidence of adverse events such as injection pain, hypoxemia, hypotension, bradycardia, choking, and body movement were significantly lower in group S. The satisfaction scores of the endoscopist and anesthesiologist were (4.58±0.49 vs 3.71±0.83) and (4.75±0.44 vs 3.33±0.92), respectively. Conclusion The combination of propofol and esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) improves the safety and reduces the incidence of adverse events in patients with obesity during painless gastroscopy. Thus, this method is worthy of clinical application. Clinical Trials Registration ChiCTR 2200062547.

show abstract

“…It has been adopted in some European countries for decades and has been used in Chinese hospitals in recent years. Besides treating depression, esketamine is applied for clinical sedation and analgesia associated with same-day bidirectional endoscopy ( Long et al, 2022 ), pediatric dental surgery ( Xin et al, 2021 ) and mechanical ventilation in ICU patients ( Song et al, 2022 ) When it is used for bronchoscopy, esketamine relaxes bronchiolar muscles and inhibits bronchial constriction ( Huang et al, 2022 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The safety and efficacy of esketamine in comparison to dexmedetomidine during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome: A randomized, controlled and prospective clinical trial

Zheng

Sang

et al. 2022

Front. Pharmacol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Purpose: Data and high-quality studies of anesthetic methods for children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) who undergo drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) are limited. Research on pediatric DISE using esketamine has never been reported before. To test the safety and efficacy of esketamine during DISE in children with OSAHS, we compare esketamine (Group K) with dexmedetomidine (Group D) in this study.Methods: 100 children with ASA Ⅰ∼Ⅱ grade, prepared for an elective adenotonsillectomy under general anesthesia, were enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups. Midazolam 0.1 mg/kg was administered intravenously for both groups. In Group D a 1 μg/kg bolus of dexmedetomidine was given over 10 min followed by the infusion rate 1 μg/kg/hr to the end of DISE. Group K received a 1.0 mg/kg IV bolus of esketamine over 10 s followed by the infusion rate 1 mg/kg/hr to the end of DISE.Results: Group K had a higher percentage of success than Group D (p = 0.008). The onset time of Group K was shorter than that of Group D (p = 0.000). The University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score of Group K was higher than that of Group D (p = 0.005). The risk of adverse effects (AEs) was lower in Group K (p = 0.000). In Group D, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and heart rate (HR) all decreased, while in Group K, SBP, DBP, and HR hardly changed.Conclusion: Esketamine in comparison to dexmedetomidine provides more effective and safer depth of anesthesia for OSAHS pediatric DISE by ensuring short onset time, deep sedation, and few AEs.Clinical Trial Registration: ClincalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04877639

show abstract

Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine/Propofol and Sufentanil/Propofol on the Incidence of Intraoperative Hypoxemia during Bronchoscopy: Protocol for a Randomized, Prospective, Parallel-Group Trial

Cited by 16 publications

References 34 publications

The median effective concentration of propofol in combination with different doses of esketamine during gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults

The median effective concentration of propofol in combination with different doses of esketamine during gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults

Efficacy and Safety of a Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

The safety and efficacy of esketamine in comparison to dexmedetomidine during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome: A randomized, controlled and prospective clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About